!PSmBFWNKoXmlQBzUQf:helsinki-systems.de

Stage 1 systemd

79 Members
systemd in NixOs's stage 1, replacing the current bash tooling https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/projects/5127 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
22 May 2023
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgMhmm I'll investigate this tomorrow18:46:40
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianill push my changes one sec.18:48:09
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.org Ahh it didn't land in 253-stable: https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/blob/v253-stable/src/partition/repart.c#L3917 18:48:55
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgeven if the commit was from a day before they tagged18:49:07
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianhttps://github.com/arianvp/server-optimised-nixos/blob/157ef33b278b581b92aad8c3200941139d84f96a/flake.nix18:50:05
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianaha!18:50:20
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianthat explains18:50:22
@arianvp:matrix.orgAriani'll ask for a backport18:50:33
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgThat would be nice18:50:42
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.org But that means they have created the 253-stable branch before they tagged the release in the main repo 18:51:01
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianoh that is really strange. 18:54:15
@arianvp:matrix.orgArian Sorry false alarm. the commit is not in v253. My git foo was off 18:59:24
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianhttps://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/pull/29518:59:34
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianThe answer was "This is really stretching the backport policy. But we can see what the others say"18:59:50
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco

This is really stretching the backport policy. But we can see what the others say

Where was this said?

19:01:43
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianTo me personally by a systemd dev 19:02:08
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianI just noticed nikstur is in the same chat where I asked it lol19:03:31
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgBut why is it not in v253?19:03:37
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccowas that in an irc room or something? I'm honestly still not sure where all the systemd communications go on :P19:03:37
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgAhh they do more cherry-picking and delaying than I thought they do19:05:15
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgBecause the commit was on the 14th Feb and they tagged the release on the 15th 19:05:42
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.org
In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
Ill make a PR to add the repart definitions file to config.system.build.repartDefitions so that it can be consumed by image builder
I thought about that too. The biggest problem is that you likely want to create different partitions in the disk image than you want systemd-repart to create on the final disk (e.g. create a root, A/B partitions etc.)
19:13:35
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianAh good point19:42:26
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianYeh maybe i make a new Nixos module option then. OTOH repart just skips partitions that already exist. So might just work19:42:49
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgYes it skips existing ones but you'd have the opposite problem: you'd create partitions earlier (during disk creation) than you would actually want them (on first boot).20:19:35
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianSeparate config it is then :)21:53:51
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgIs this something you want to upstream into Nixpkgs? 21:59:56
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgThe image builder?22:00:10
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianDefinitely 22:07:30
@nikstur:matrix.org@nikstur:matrix.orgOk, I have some code for it already, we can cooperate if you're interested 22:11:09

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6