| 27 Jun 2023 |
 @passion-fruit:matrix.org | that did it! Thank you so much :) - i checked lsusb -t after booting with the live iso and the usb controllers were using hcd. added xhci_hcd and now it works without issue | 16:24:57 |
| 29 Jun 2023 |
 @lily:lily.flowers | So why is boot.initrd.services.lvm.enable a hidden option if it is required to enable it for systemd-stage-1 whenever you have a LVM needed for root | 20:10:35 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | (I, uh, spent longer than I wish I had the last few weeks banging my head against that) | 20:10:52 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | (until I found that option) | 20:11:05 |
 @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | I guess we forgot to unhide it in the unhide PR? | 20:11:25 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | Maybe. I didn't think it was a sd-stage-1 only though, but LVM root in scripted stage 1 seems to work just fine (maybe it manually runs vgchange instead of relying on udev rules idk) | 20:12:16 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | * Maybe. I didn't think it was a sd-stage-1 only option though, but LVM root in scripted stage 1 seems to work just fine (maybe it manually runs vgchange instead of relying on udev rules idk) | 20:12:22 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | I thought it was only for sd-initrd | 20:12:45 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | Yep scripted stage-1 absolutely does | 20:12:45 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | Yeah I guess so | 20:12:52 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | Yeah git blame says it was added in the initial sd-initrd commit | 20:13:30 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | Gonna make a PR to unhide that then | 20:13:36 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | I should probably backport that PR too then, right? | 20:17:14 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | I guess? I tend not to think about stable when working on sd-initrd. Once we remove the "experimental" denotation in the docs, I'll have to change my ways though :P | 20:17:55 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | I opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/240601, but I actually found a lot more options all over the place left hidden that I'm fixing now. So I'm gonna push those to that PR too and rename it in a minute | 20:25:00 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | interesting... | 20:25:58 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | I thought I had built the options JSON thingy with hidden options included and scanned over them all a while ago | 20:26:15 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | Was boot.initrd.systemd.users and stuff specifically supposed to be left hidden ElvishJerricco? | 20:26:19 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
I thought I had built the options JSON thingy with hidden options included and scanned over them all a while ago I mean maybe most of these were supposed to stay hidden. I think I've found 5 more | 20:26:32 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
Was boot.initrd.systemd.users and stuff specifically supposed to be left hidden ElvishJerricco? I never had an opinion on that... | 20:26:47 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | It's certainly kind of an internal thing | 20:26:54 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | but also feasible that people would need it | 20:26:59 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | I'll unhide it then I suppose. It's not like we hide other internal please-do-not-change-unless-you-know-what-you-are-doing options | 20:27:38 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | we actually do though | 20:27:52 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | (well mostly ... there are a few. We really don't have a policy on it afaik) | 20:27:53 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | there are plenty of options marked "internal" | 20:27:58 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | Yeah, but these are visible = false | 20:28:06 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | Does internal = true also imply "pls no show in manual"? | 20:28:38 |
| @lily:lily.flowers | I believe so. Most of those are like module-internal rather than bad-idea-but-you-can-mess-with-it-if-you-want internal | 20:29:01 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | gotcha | 20:29:12 |
