!PSmBFWNKoXmlQBzUQf:helsinki-systems.de

Stage 1 systemd

81 Members
systemd in NixOs's stage 1, replacing the current bash tooling https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/projects/5126 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Dec 2022
@me:linj.tech@me:linj.techit hangs here if I use linux_latest (6.1)15:42:19
@me:linj.tech@me:linj.tech * it hangs here if I use linux_latest (6.1) and works well using the lts kernel 15:43:21
@me:linj.tech@me:linj.techany ideas about how to debug this?15:43:35
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgThat's... strange15:44:04
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgCan you describe the hang? Is it possible the graphics driver is scraping up?15:44:38
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org* Can you describe the hang? Is it possible the graphics driver is screwing up?15:44:59
@me:linj.tech@me:linj.techwait a minute15:45:35
@me:linj.tech@me:linj.tech
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
Can you describe the hang? Is it possible the graphics driver is screwing up?
even though the screen does not change, I can type the password for luks and then the system can boots into gdm. I guess it is has something to do with my config for passing through a nvidia gpu.
17:06:54
@me:linj.tech@me:linj.tech
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
Can you describe the hang? Is it possible the graphics driver is screwing up?
* even though the screen does not change, I can type the password for luks and then the system can boot into gdm. I guess it is has something to do with my config for passing through a nvidia gpu.
17:07:13
@me:linj.tech@me:linj.techbtw, nvidia gpu pass through is broken with linux 6.1. The system hangs when I start the virtual machine with the passed through nvidia gpu.17:08:44
@me:linj.tech@me:linj.tech * btw, nvidia gpu passing through is broken with linux 6.1. The system hangs when I start the virtual machine with the passed through nvidia gpu.17:09:04
@k900:0upti.meK900$5 says blame Nvidia17:09:37
19 Dec 2022
@lgcl:lgcl.delgcl (she/they) changed their profile picture.13:46:48
20 Dec 2022
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org Well, TIL about SYSTEMD_SYSROOT_FSTAB 08:37:09
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgthat would have been good to know08:37:14
@winterqt:nixos.devWinter (she/her)
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
that would have been good to know
(context, out of curiosity?)
16:07:46
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org Winter (she/her): Basically, we get some nice things automatically by putting stuff at /sysroot/etc/fstab instead of /etc/fstab, and it's much easier if you can point it at a file of our choice instead of /sysroot/etc/fstab 16:25:34
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org

otherwise you have to deal with the fact that /sysroot/etc/fstab might not be correct for the current generation so you might have to update it, but what if /sysroot/etc is a different file system? Or if we can't write to that location for whatever reason? You can bind mount something magical over the path but that has its own quirks.

All that just goes away thanks to SYSTEMD_SYSROOT_FSTAB :P

16:26:54
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.organd for it, we get to remove a silly hack that we have, and our FSes use the correct initrd targets instead of the regular FS targets.16:27:52
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org * and for it, we get to remove a silly hack that we have where we set IgnoreOnIsolate when we really shouldn't have to, and our FSes use the correct initrd targets instead of the regular FS targets. 16:28:18
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org (all this because I wanted to test out hibernation stuff and noticed that the hibernation resume service runs with unfortunate ordering at the moment; queue discovering that we're supposed to get an fsck unit that introduces the right ordering (though even that shouldn't really be necessary), and then a whole rabbit hole about why that doesn't work quite right either) 16:30:13
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org This is infuriating. I'm now properly onto the point of getting fsck stuff all working well, and the part that already worked in stage 2 isn't working anymore and only intermittenetly! 18:28:30
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org I can see the unit exists with {Requires,After}=systemd-fsck@dev-vdb.service, but that unit only gets started sometimes 18:29:33
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org * I can see the mount unit exists with {Requires,After}=systemd-fsck@dev-vdb.service, but that unit only gets started sometimes 18:29:43
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org This is the part that I didn't change. No clue why it's busted now 18:30:00
23 Dec 2022
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgOk, this accomplishes much of what I want for file system related things: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...ElvishJerricco:nixpkgs:systemd-stage-1-bind-fstab It's not in its final form, and it's definitely like two or three PRs in one branch right now, and definitely not all of it will be making it into a PR at all. But fsck, initrd targets, and hibernate all work much more correctly now20:42:00
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org(two of the new systemd patches have been merged upstream and I don't think I need the other two)20:43:02
25 Dec 2022
@ahsmha:matrix.org@ahsmha:matrix.org left the room.10:36:02
27 Dec 2022
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orghttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/20780122:24:15
28 Dec 2022
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92What was the state of networking in initrd? I think there was a PR, but I cannot find it anymore.12:38:27

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6