!PbtOpdWBSRFbEZRLIf:numtide.com

Nix Community Projects

593 Members
Meta discussions related to https://nix-community.org. (For project specific discussions use github issues or projects own matrix channel). Need help from an admin? Open an issue on https://github.com/nix-community/infra/issues156 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
22 Jan 2025
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92I have seen this in nix as well23:17:29
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily no, it's just broken because we haven't bumped libgit2 in Nixpkgs yet 23:20:48
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily that's why I had to test with --override-input 23:20:53
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily it's a catch-22 since by the time it hits the channels nix-init will be broken 23:21:03
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily so ideally we'd get a nix-init release cut before the staging-next (as the main consumer of releases is presumably Nixpkgs) 23:21:29
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI could pin the flake input to the PR I suppose 😅23:22:25
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 emily: you mean staging-next? 23:23:01
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92I think I would prefer pinning that over breaking ci23:23:13
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily it's not in -next yet (it's not even in staging) 23:23:32
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily we could merge into staging and then pin staging, but then CI would be building stdenv 23:23:41
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilypinning to the PR head produces a working build though23:23:48
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92Ok. I guess it would be fine to bump a nix-init release once we it hits staging-next.23:25:44
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92No one will be mad if it's broken in staging for a while.23:26:51
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyfair enough23:28:24
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily pinning staging-next in the flake feels a bit weird though 23:28:40
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI probably will not remember to unpin it once the cycle is over23:28:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily I was hoping to get this addressed before merging the libgit2 bump as otherwise we are going to have ~0 regressions 23:29:04
23 Jan 2025
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92pinning staging-next is a bit weird but I also don't expect too many people to use the github version over the nixpkgs version of nix-init00:08:22
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyfair00:17:05
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilycould just pin the PR head for now to unblock CI in that case?00:17:11
@bumperboat:matrix.orgbumperboat joined the room.08:38:03
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 emily: Is the the merge-base on something that has a reasonable amount of packages cached? 09:31:39
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92We have github actions in their, so I don't want to block runners in nix-community for half a day.09:32:14
@nilp0inter2k6:matrix.orgRoberto Abdelkader Martínez Pérez set a profile picture.16:33:45
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily yep, base is master 16:34:08
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily it's just the libgit2 bump (+ associated fixes) 16:34:18
@nilp0inter2k6:matrix.orgRoberto Abdelkader Martínez Pérez changed their profile picture.16:34:58
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusCan @ElvishJerricco receive an invitation to be part of the nix-community org?16:41:20
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusto be part of https://github.com/orgs/nix-community/teams/lanzaboote16:41:25
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius btw, Mic92 do you still need to be part of the maintainer team of lanzaboote? I assume this was to debug CI, right? 16:41:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6