| 15 Jan 2025 |
 hexa | * --option sandbox false/relaxed yield the same issue | 01:13:17 |
 emily | weird. they definitely shouldn't | 01:14:29 |
| emily | if it's nixpkgs-review you need --build-args or something | 01:14:42 |
| hexa | no, plain nix-build | 01:14:53 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/373903 | 01:16:34 |
| emily | ++ lib.optionals stdenv.hostPlatform.isDarwin [ darwin.apple_sdk.frameworks.AppKit ]; can be dropped entirely fwiw (it has no effect on the build) | 01:17:36 |
| emily | not sure why you'd get sandbox size issues even with the sandbox off though | 01:17:43 |
| hexa | are you getting it as well? 😄 | 01:20:37 |
| hexa | ok, so --option sandbox does not seem to propagate to the remote builder | 01:24:59 |
| hexa | it works when passing it on the remote builder itself | 01:25:12 |
| emily | ah, I was busy downloading a bunch of crates to test :) | 01:30:16 |
| emily | it might be a ? option you can use on the remote builder URL | 01:30:23 |
| emily | dunno, I don't have the builders set as remote builders since I don't trust them | 01:30:34 |
| hexa | I use the comunity builders through shell aliases 🙂 | 01:53:33 |
 Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | if I recognize this issue correctly, it happens to be on huge symlinkJoins in nixpkgs-review, and they work around it by using pkgs.buildEnv
https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/blob/b3ccb2adef4b173a1f81fb258492a8a185a224ad/nixpkgs_review/nix/review-shell.nix#L40 | 10:20:02 |
| Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | not sure what is causing this issue on your package | 10:20:18 |
| Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | * not sure what is causing this issue in your package | 10:20:23 |
|  Paul Meyer (katexochen) joined the room. | 10:23:07 |
|  SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (utc+3) to SomeoneSerge. | 19:02:42 |
|  pistache changed their profile picture. | 22:06:54 |
| pistache changed their profile picture. | 22:07:34 |
| 16 Jan 2025 |
 matthewcroughan @ 39c3 (DECT 94667 or 97340 or 67192) | is aarch64.nixos.community down? | 13:28:58 |
 Gaétan Lepage | Nope | 13:37:18 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Oh yes | 13:37:37 |
| Gaétan Lepage | It was a system provided by Equinix systems. They ended the sponsorship at the end of 2024.
Since then, nix-community has started to rent a new ARM builder. | 13:38:19 |
| Gaétan Lepage | https://nix-community.org/community-builder/ | 13:38:28 |
| Gaétan Lepage | * It was a system provided by Equinix systems. They ended the sponsorship at the end of 2024.
Since then, nix-community has started to rent a new ARM builder.
--> aarch64-build-box.nix-community.org | 13:38:51 |
| matthewcroughan @ 39c3 (DECT 94667 or 97340 or 67192) | FWIW if you guys buy or subsidize the cost of an ampere machine we can host it in our new hackspace Birkenhack near to Liverpool on a gigabit connection | 13:40:28 |
| Gaétan Lepage | The current box is 169€/month. It means that over two year we would have paid for a ~4k€ system.
Might be worth to consider buying idk... Of course the reliability/trust aspect has to be considered. | 13:42:43 |
| matthewcroughan @ 39c3 (DECT 94667 or 97340 or 67192) | I expect it to be very reliable, and you can trust me :) | 14:23:12 |
