| 14 Nov 2023 |
|  @vyls:matrix.org left the room. | 18:15:19 |
 zowoq | Everyone is now a trusted-user again on build-box.nix-community.org. | 21:51:57 |
| 15 Nov 2023 |
|  @grahamc:nixos.orgchanged room power levels. | 16:04:01 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org left the room. | 16:04:02 |
|  @qyliss:fairydust.space joined the room. | 17:20:28 |
| @qyliss:fairydust.space left the room. | 17:50:28 |
|  NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 18:12:07 |
|  @eisfunke:eisfunke.com changed their profile picture. | 22:40:49 |
| 19 Nov 2023 |
|  pbsds changed their display name from pbsds to pbsds (federation borken, may not see reply). | 03:36:08 |
|  ZXGU joined the room. | 11:00:05 |
| pbsds changed their display name from pbsds (federation borken, may not see reply) to pbsds. | 20:39:08 |
| 20 Nov 2023 |
|  @mightyiam:matrix.org joined the room. | 10:20:44 |
| 22 Nov 2023 |
|  @zarel_it:matrix.org joined the room. | 09:56:46 |
|  @pennae:matrix.eno.space joined the room. | 21:36:08 |
| @pennae:matrix.eno.space | heya. what's the odds on donating something as unfinished as label-tracker to nix-community and have current efforts land in the community repo over time? | 21:38:38 |
| 23 Nov 2023 |
 Mic92 | In reply to @pennae:matrix.eno.space
heya. what's the odds on donating something as unfinished as label-tracker to nix-community and have current efforts land in the community repo over time? Is this for nixpkgs? | 07:25:28 |
| Mic92 | My experience with these types of projects is that it needs to provide some value for others for them to start contributing. Otherwise they are more likely to start their own project that they can own. | 07:28:24 |
 Jonas Chevalier | Might be worth shooting a message on Discourse to see if there is interest | 09:01:20 |
 raitobezarius | There's already people working on it as part of STF | 11:07:33 |
|  lillecarl joined the room. | 13:13:40 |
| 24 Nov 2023 |
| Mic92 | adisbladis: don't know what your plans with nix-unit are, but it seemed ready to me: https://github.com/nix-community/nix-unit/issues/30 | 07:46:28 |
 adisbladis | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
adisbladis: don't know what your plans with nix-unit are, but it seemed ready to me: https://github.com/nix-community/nix-unit/issues/30 I don't want to do release management and all that jazz.. | 09:37:13 |
| adisbladis | But I also think it's ready for nixpkgs | 09:37:21 |
| adisbladis | I was about to add it myself the other day | 09:37:31 |
| Mic92 | In reply to @adis:blad.is
I don't want to do release management and all that jazz.. I can also help with that part | 09:39:53 |
| adisbladis | =) | 09:44:11 |
| adisbladis | We want exactly the same release cadence as nix-eval-jobs anyway | 09:44:22 |
| adisbladis | Mic92: So I'm OK with either merging the -unstable PR or we can cut a release right away and update it | 09:48:08 |
| Mic92 | adisbladis: I make a release than. | 09:48:29 |
| Mic92 | Don't think we need those release branches we have in nix-eval-jobs | 09:48:40 |
