| 4 Jan 2025 |
 liberodark | After you can give me an installation by nix-anywhere and I push it on the machine you have a dedicated fullstack v4 and v6 IP. | 01:12:51 |
| liberodark | * After you can give me an installation by nix-anywhere (for example) and I push it on the machine you have a dedicated fullstack v4 and v6 IP. | 01:13:09 |
 zowoq | Sorry, I not sure that I understand correctly.
We do need to cover the hosting cost?
Who has access to the machine if we need a manual reboot? | 01:48:31 |
| zowoq | * Sorry, I'm not sure that I understand correctly.
We do need to cover the hosting cost?
Who has access to the machine if we need a manual reboot? | 01:51:09 |
 tomberek | In reply to @liberodark:matrix.org
In my case I propose to provide a machine for free to help.
The hosting cost is 25€ per server.
Since we have dedicated 10 Gb lines.
Main costs are for electricity more than anything else.
On my side, i am only proposing if it can help. This might also be helpful for infra or staging. Are you in touch with the right people? | 02:28:15 |
 emily | AIUi the plan is for ofborg to use these machines | 02:28:28 |
| emily | I don't think Hydra can realistically use machines that the infra team doesn't have total control over and that don't have KVM | 02:28:45 |
| tomberek | CI is the most obvious. Nix-community might benefit. Or even dedicated access for a team, stdenv perhaps? | 02:30:23 |
| emily | this is nix-community :) | 02:31:39 |
| zowoq | Putting another machine towards ofborg or using it as an secondary builder (not replacing the current hetzner build box) may be the better option. Saving a bit of money would be nice but if it was the only x86 community builder not having kvm/ipmi access to it would probably be a recurring problem. | 03:03:19 |
| liberodark | I am in contact with some person from nixos. | 08:49:56 |
| liberodark | But for nixos-community I learned about the builder issue only yesterday. | 08:50:31 |
| liberodark | I was advised to talk to zowoq. | 08:50:53 |
| liberodark | I hope this answers your question? | 08:51:26 |
 Gaétan Lepage | In reply to @liberodark:matrix.org
But for nixos-community I learned about the builder issue only yesterday. nix-community | 09:23:38 |
| liberodark | * But for nix-community I learned about the builder issue only yesterday. | 09:24:22 |
| liberodark | fixed | 09:24:31 |
| liberodark | Redacted or Malformed Event | 11:28:39 |
| emily | Gaétan Lepage: are you using the Darwin builder right now? | 18:25:27 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Yes | 21:46:26 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Sorry, you want me to kill the job ? | 21:46:38 |
| emily | the machine is chugging quite a bit, but I'm not doing anything urgent | 21:49:30 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Yes it's definitely me | 21:50:10 |
| emily | might be worth lowering the maxJobs in your remote builder config to give them a bit of extra breathing room 😅 | 21:50:11 |
| Gaétan Lepage | That's very true. I think it defaults to 32 which is quite stupid | 21:51:15 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Each time I see one of those tweets from exo about their 9k mac minis farm, I get jalous X) | 21:52:08 |
| 5 Jan 2025 |
 hexa | same story with the aarch64-linux builder | 04:05:54 |
| hexa | this is shared infrastructure | 04:06:00 |
| hexa | take the hint | 04:06:05 |
| emily | Gaétan Lepage: darwin builder CPU is pegged (trying to unblock staging-next-24.11) | 14:32:51 |
