| 12 May 2025 |
|  nyanbinary 🏳️⚧️ joined the room. | 16:29:22 |
| nyanbinary 🏳️⚧️ | zowoq: https://github.com/nix-community/fenix/issues/195
Winter (she/her) and zmitchell stepped up to maintain fenix | 16:34:04 |
|  @fxomt:pub.solar joined the room. | 18:43:35 |
|  Winter joined the room. | 21:44:48 |
| Winter | is there a way we can enable GitHub's merge queue, or should we use Mergify? | 21:45:04 |
 lassulus | Afair we had problems with mergify because our base moved too fast and it ended up creating a lot of PRs | 21:46:48 |
 nim65s | in which project | 21:48:22 |
| nim65s | * in which project ? | 21:48:25 |
| nim65s | nixpkgs or something with less bandwidth ? | 21:49:01 |
 zowoq | I've increased the fenix teams permissions to admin so you should be able to enable the merge queue. | 21:49:17 |
| zowoq | * I've increased the fenix team permissions to admin so you should be able to enable the merge queue. | 21:49:33 |
 FliegendeWurst | yes, nixpkgs https://github.com/NixOS/org/issues/39 | 21:50:34 |
| FliegendeWurst | if I understand it correctly, all merges would need to go through the queue | 21:51:06 |
| nim65s | ok, I totally missed that, thanks :)
I know the CTO, I'll try to talk with him about those issues | 22:07:48 |
| 13 May 2025 |
|  adamcstephens left the room. | 14:42:53 |
|  @bloxx12:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:35:50 |
|  energi joined the room. | 22:43:25 |
| 14 May 2025 |
|  lily 🏳️⚧️ changed their profile picture. | 05:01:42 |
|  loopmempool joined the room. | 08:40:23 |
| 15 May 2025 |
|  @jh-devv:matrix.org joined the room. | 11:16:03 |
|  regalk removed their profile picture. | 13:02:20 |
| @jh-devv:matrix.org left the room. | 15:45:44 |
| 16 May 2025 |
|  eldritchcookie joined the room. | 11:47:53 |
| eldritchcookie | hello could somebody explain the performance implications of nixpkgs.lib compared to nixpkgs? i just find it strange that it has no benchmarks or explanationsas to why it would be faster? without either the only thing that comes to mind is they actually shouldn't have any performance difference due to lazyness | 11:56:31 |
| eldritchcookie | * hello could somebody explain the performance implications of nixpkgs.lib compared to nixpkgs? i just find it strange that it has no benchmarks or explanations as to why it would be faster? without either the only thing that comes to mind is they actually shouldn't have any performance difference due to lazyness | 11:56:48 |
 emily | not having to download 40 megs of tarball, presumably? | 11:58:53 |
| emily | (though you end up downloading Nixpkgs almost always anyway) | 11:58:59 |
| emily | looks like the Darwin builder died? not responding to SSH or ping. (I was running a build with some margin for cores but possible another build started running in the interim and OOM'd it or such, or maybe it's an expected periodic reboot? macOS usually doesn't kill stuff when running out of memory so I'd be a little surprised if it was OOM) | 21:48:39 |
| emily | looks like it's back (and didn't reboot) | 22:15:23 |
| zowoq | https://status.oakhost.net/incidents/504c521a-ec08-4a62-befc-f72865662bb0 | 23:20:20 |
