| 15 Oct 2024 |
 SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | zowoq: do you think it's time nix-community's cuda jobset was advertised on discourse? I'd archive https://github.com/SomeoneSerge/nixpkgs-cuda-ci/, updating the readme to point at nix-community docs | 14:12:50 |
 artturin | tomberek: I'm gonna add UNSTABLE, Breaking changes may be done without warning. to both bundler and nix-bundle | 15:37:13 |
| artturin | https://github.com/NixOS/bundlers/pull/23
https://github.com/nix-community/nix-bundle/pull/114 | 15:40:03 |
|  @tanvir:hackliberty.org changed their display name from Tanvir to 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒗𝒊𝒓. | 16:06:42 |
| @tanvir:hackliberty.org changed their profile picture. | 20:15:18 |
 zowoq | In reply to @ss:someonex.net
zowoq: do you think it's time nix-community's cuda jobset was advertised on discourse? I'd archive https://github.com/SomeoneSerge/nixpkgs-cuda-ci/, updating the readme to point at nix-community docs What are you planning to advertise? IIRC we were going to switch aarch64 from sbsa to jetson? | 23:22:39 |
| SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) |
What are you planning to advertise
I'm unsure it's my place to be announcing anything as I'm not the one maintaining the infra, but basically that, on still experimental grounds (?), --arg config "{ cudaSupport = true; }" version of nixos-unstable can now be consumed via nix-community cachix, which is bigger/safer/more sustainable than the previous options, yada yada
we were going to switch aarch64 from sbsa to jetson?
Ah yes, we can push that through beforehand. That said, I reckon x86_64-linux audience is big enough to warrant the announcement ~~and I'm not even sure if there's a lot of nixos jetson enthusiasts out there or it's all corporations who can run their own caches~~
| 23:36:16 |
| SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | *
What are you planning to advertise
I'm unsure it's my place to be announcing anything as I'm not the one maintaining the infra, but basically that, on still experimental grounds (?), --arg config "{ cudaSupport = true; }" version of nixos-unstable can now be consumed via nix-community cachix, which is bigger/safer/more sustainable than the previous options, yada yada
we were going to switch aarch64 from sbsa to jetson?
Ah yes, we can push that through beforehand. That said, I reckon x86_64-linux audience is big enough to warrant the announcement and I'm not even sure if there's a lot of nixos jetson enthusiasts out there or it's all corporations who can run their own caches
| 23:36:25 |
| SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) | *
What are you planning to advertise
I'm unsure it's my place to be announcing anything as I'm not the one maintaining the (new) infra, but basically that, on still experimental grounds (?), --arg config "{ cudaSupport = true; }" version of nixos-unstable can now be consumed via nix-community cachix, which is bigger/safer/more sustainable than the previous options, yada yada
we were going to switch aarch64 from sbsa to jetson?
Ah yes, we can push that through beforehand. That said, I reckon x86_64-linux audience is big enough to warrant the announcement and I'm not even sure if there's a lot of nixos jetson enthusiasts out there or it's all corporations who can run their own caches
| 23:37:58 |
| 16 Oct 2024 |
| zowoq | If you want we could leave aarch64 as it is for now, I'll just drop aarch64 from our docs so we aren't advertising something that we're going to change.
I don't mind who does the announcement but lets check with Jonas Chevalier Mic92
| 02:44:12 |
