| 9 Jun 2024 |
|  magic_rb joined the room. | 14:19:31 |
 Mic92 | In reply to @br4ch1st0chr0n3:matrix.org
Hi! I made a release of cache-nix-action, but I can't publish it to GitHub Marketplace.
It's written:
nix-community must accept the GitHub Marketplace Developer Agreement. Contact an org admin to accept it.
Admins, could you please accept the Agreement?
Has this been fixed? Looks like something is published here: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/cache-nix-store | 17:28:44 |
| 10 Jun 2024 |
 Danila Danko | 
Download image.png | 05:15:00 |
| Danila Danko | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
Has this been fixed? Looks like something is published here: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/cache-nix-store For some reason, they ask to accept the Agreement again. They don't let me publish v5.2.1 (I can't choose v5.2.1 in the drop-down list). | 05:16:17 |
| 11 Jun 2024 |
 zowoq | In reply to @br4ch1st0chr0n3:matrix.org
Hi! I made a release of cache-nix-action, but I can't publish it to GitHub Marketplace.
It's written:
nix-community must accept the GitHub Marketplace Developer Agreement. Contact an org admin to accept it.
Admins, could you please accept the Agreement?
I've accepted it, I think you will need to update the 5.2.1 release to publish it. | 02:49:36 |
 musicmatze | Does someone get weird error: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/ did not send all necessary objects errors when trying to nixpkgs-review stuff on the community builder? I am getting these for two or three days now... | 06:20:53 |
| Mic92 | Not seen this so far. | 13:16:27 |
| Mic92 | But I am not running nixpkgs-review on this machine. | 13:16:49 |
 teto | musicmatze: I've seen this with nixpkgs recently . I dont remember if it was at the same time my repo got corrupted because of unexpected shutdown. I dont have it anymore anyway | 13:24:31 |
| musicmatze | okay, maybe a fresh clone will do | 13:36:35 |
|  9pfs joined the room. | 20:24:39 |
| 12 Jun 2024 |
|  @3650badcop:catgirl.cloud joined the room. | 08:46:00 |
 toonn | Is there a way to re-run nixpkgs-review just on the failed builds? I'm getting what I believe to be spurious failures on substitutes. | 14:51:42 |
 leona | all successful builds should be in the nix store, so it should only build the failed ones. Or am I reading your question wrong? | 14:59:30 |
| toonn | That makes sense and is probably the bulk of things anyway. But I did mean without cleaning up the temporary worktree and having to check it out from scratch when re-running. | 16:03:47 |
| 14 Jun 2024 |
|  pwychowaniec changed their profile picture. | 14:52:17 |
|  mintpixel joined the room. | 15:35:24 |
| mintpixel | Hi, ive been trying to get polkit working and have failed pretty bad. Im using swaywm. Ive tried whats in the docs and it doesnt work. has anyone got this to work? Im having a hard time finding help. Thanks! | 15:36:49 |
|  dish [Fox/It/She] joined the room. | 19:22:44 |
| 15 Jun 2024 |
 K900 | Is darwin01 dead? | 08:06:35 |
| K900 | Or just very slow? | 08:06:36 |
| K900 | I'm trying to build a thing and it's just ... not | 08:06:42 |
 Gaétan Lepage | I was not able to build anything on it from yesterday evening | 08:14:32 |
|  Todd Thompson joined the room. | 10:28:13 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Maybe a reboot could help. It is still broken for me. | 12:46:43 |
| toonn | How do I get nixpkgs-review to build against a particular commit rather than a branch? | 13:07:30 |
| toonn | Ah, --branch takes commits apparently. | 13:32:52 |
|  @ser:sergevictor.eu joined the room. | 13:48:34 |
 Matt Sturgeon | In reply to @toonn:matrix.org
Ah, --branch takes commits apparently. Lots of tools use rev, ref, commit, sha, hash, branch, tag, etc interchangeably 😕 | 14:06:59 |
| zowoq | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Is darwin01 dead? I've rebooted it, seems to be fine now. | 22:55:09 |
