!PbtOpdWBSRFbEZRLIf:numtide.com

Nix Community Projects

651 Members
Meta discussions related to https://nix-community.org. (For project specific discussions use github issues or projects own matrix channel). Need help from an admin? Open an issue on https://github.com/nix-community/infra/issues164 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Oct 2023
@thesola10:matrix.orgTheSola10knew it, i wasn't sure about the standing, but regardless of whether it's flakehub or another platform, the FlakeHub approach to flake indexing and versioning feels like a good match for flake shortnames07:43:09
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius Also I'd highly suggest discussing this in channels like #dev:nixos.org 07:43:24
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @thesola10:matrix.org
knew it, i wasn't sure about the standing, but regardless of whether it's flakehub or another platform, the FlakeHub approach to flake indexing and versioning feels like a good match for flake shortnames
Possibly
07:45:07
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI don't think your proposal should be made dependent on Flakehub then07:45:27
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut on any implementation of the idea07:45:34
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThough I am not so convinced about DockerHub style feature in a community project 07:45:51
@thesola10:matrix.orgTheSola10

In addition, this could also mean a nix config option to allow sysadmins to override the "default namespace", like a rewrite rule:

but yea

07:45:55
@thesola10:matrix.orgTheSola10well we are heavily reliant on github anyway 07:47:12
@thesola10:matrix.orgTheSola10having a "home platform" could encourage decentralization, like pushing from self-hosted GitLabs and Giteas07:47:48
@thesola10:matrix.orgTheSola10as well as providing a "chain of trust" between a flake source and, say, a matching Cachix07:48:36
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusIt seems fragile to further build on the flake abstraction in this manner07:49:31
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut if Flakes proponents want it this way and Nix core team find a way to make place for that, it's not my business07:50:03
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI don't think decentralization is a goal that this proposal is particularly solving in any way07:50:32
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut that may be because most of the stuff I do already consumes from 30 different forges with Nix just fine without Flakes07:51:24
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusSo I must not be the target for this stuff07:51:30
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusProviding chain of trust between flake source and a cache is probably a misfeature as it is right now because it reintroduces imperative management and breaks the local scoping expectations07:52:24
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusIn my opinion at least07:52:32
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusIt's convenient but at what cost of the years of cultural shift we have been pursuing07:52:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusAgain don't let this opinion discourage you from pursuing what you feel is a good thing07:53:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI am not really the good audience for Flakes related stuff based on my own experience as a Nixpkgs developers 07:54:49
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius* I am not really the good audience for Flakes related stuff based on my own experience as a Nixpkgs developer07:54:58
@9hp71n:matrix.orgghpzin joined the room.08:00:44
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin
In reply to @guibou:matrix.org
Hello. I'm nixGL (https://github.com/guibou/nixGL) author and my friend teto suggested that nixGL can be moved to nix community. I have no time / motivation / available hardware / use case anymore for nixGL, but apparently that's used, so I'll be more than happy to give it to the community.

What could be the next step?
Please make a "discussion" here https://github.com/orgs/nix-community/discussions
08:02:27
@fwam:karp.lolfwamHmm, why is vscode extensions dir mutable by default?10:11:55
@fwam:karp.lolfwam* Hmm, why is vscode extensions dir mutable by default in hm?10:12:12
@thubrecht:matrix.orgthubrecht joined the room.10:40:10
13 Oct 2023
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈 Why do I get warnings about "allowed-users" and "trusted-users" being unknown options, but only when using nix-eval-jobs? 13:30:30
15 Oct 2023
@ilaumjd:matrix.orgilaumjd joined the room.14:24:59
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan TojnarI assume not being able to build a package whose dependency I have already built locally is downfall from https://github.com/nix-community/infra/pull/73519:07:32
@jtojnar:matrix.orgJan Tojnar

This is what I am running:

$ nix-build -A loupe --builders "ssh-ng://build01.nix-community.org x86_64-linux - 100 1 big-parallel,kvm,nixos-test"
this derivation will be built:
  /nix/store/hlk8r58vrr89z8bbllvhl0gv603s6bh0-loupe-45.0.drv
building '/nix/store/hlk8r58vrr89z8bbllvhl0gv603s6bh0-loupe-45.0.drv' on 'ssh-ng://build01.nix-community.org'...
copying 1 paths...
copying path '/nix/store/nwji103d89igy5vqkfhsbkny8jbzqz42-glycin-loaders-0.1.1' to 'ssh-ng://build01.nix-community.org'...
error: cannot add path '/nix/store/nwji103d89igy5vqkfhsbkny8jbzqz42-glycin-loaders-0.1.1' because it lacks a signature by a trusted key
error: builder for '/nix/store/hlk8r58vrr89z8bbllvhl0gv603s6bh0-loupe-45.0.drv' failed with exit code 1
19:08:21

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6