| 1 May 2023 |
 Mic92 | There is an ARM channel in the NixOS space: https://matrix.to/#/#nixos-on-arm:nixos.org | 19:41:51 |
 Ilan Joselevich (Kranzes) | Tristan B. Velloza Kildaire This room is for stuff related to the management of the nix-community GitHub organization | 19:57:45 |
 @deavmi:envs.net | Oh | 19:58:40 |
| @deavmi:envs.net | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
There is an ARM channel in the NixOS space: https://matrix.to/#/#nixos-on-arm:nixos.org Thank you! | 19:59:10 |
| 5 May 2023 |
|  raboof joined the room. | 08:29:02 |
| 6 May 2023 |
 DavHau | Is there any good reason why hardware.enableRedistributableFirmware is not enabled by default under nixos?
I've spent the last couple of hours trying to find out why none of my wifi adapters would work.
Is it really necessary that people have to go through that pain? Why don't we just simply flip the switch for everyone? | 23:21:04 |
 figsoda | In reply to @hsngrmpf:matrix.org
Is there any good reason why hardware.enableRedistributableFirmware is not enabled by default under nixos?
I've spent the last couple of hours trying to find out why none of my wifi adapters would work.
Is it really necessary that people have to go through that pain? Why don't we just simply flip the switch for everyone? this might not be the best room to get answers from, I think it's for nix-community the organization and not the nix community in general | 23:26:57 |
| figsoda | https://matrix.to/#/#dev:nixos.org or https://matrix.to/#/#nix:nixos.org might be better | 23:27:25 |
| 7 May 2023 |
 Jonas Chevalier | It's because some of the drivers are unfree, so you have to also eval nixpkgs with allowUnfree | 09:05:25 |
| DavHau | I did not need to enable allowUnfree in order to evaluate it for aarch64. Is there a difference between platforms? | 16:29:04 |
| Mic92 | maybe we don't have unfree firmware for aarch64? | 18:35:01 |
| DavHau | Mic92: I just tried and even on an x86_64-linux it evaluates just fine.
Only enableAllFirmware = true requires allowUnfree.
| 21:54:41 |
| 8 May 2023 |
|  @lotte:chir.rs changed their profile picture. | 07:13:58 |
 hexa | trying to transfer a repo into nix-community | 22:35:42 |
| hexa | 
Download image.png | 22:35:55 |
| hexa | I'm a member on the org, but not in any teams yet | 22:37:21 |
 raitobezarius | I really like the fact you went with the proposal | 22:53:05 |
| hexa | 🙂 | 22:53:41 |
| 9 May 2023 |
 zowoq | We disabled creating and transferring repos: https://github.com/nix-community/infra/issues/534#issuecomment-1514786986 | 00:12:04 |
| zowoq | Are you going to submit the offline build changes upstream? | 00:12:05 |
| figsoda | In reply to @zowoq:matrix.org
We disabled creating and transferring repos: https://github.com/nix-community/infra/issues/534#issuecomment-1514786986 oops, was this talking about me? | 00:17:51 |
| figsoda | ok it's for sure me your comment was 30 minutes after my first commit to the repo | 00:18:46 |
| figsoda | I will make sure to make my projects mature a bit before moving it to nix-community | 00:20:02 |
| zowoq | Yes, sorry. I meant to create a post on https://github.com/orgs/nix-community/discussions so we could have a discussion with the community about this but I forgot. | 00:39:16 |
| zowoq | FWIW I'd say that the repo you created is mature and popular enough to move into nix-community now anyway. Mostly just don't want have a collection of random, temporary forks and abandoned, incomplete projects. | 00:39:41 |
| figsoda | Thanks for the explanation | 01:13:44 |
|  @johannes.kirschbauer:scs.ems.host changed their display name from Johannes Kirschbauer (@hsjobeki) to hsjobeki. | 07:37:00 |
| @johannes.kirschbauer:scs.ems.host changed their display name from hsjobeki to hsjobeki|m. | 07:54:22 |
| @johannes.kirschbauer:scs.ems.host changed their display name from hsjobeki|m to Johannes Kirschbauer @hsjobeki. | 08:02:16 |
| hexa | In reply to @zowoq:matrix.org
Are you going to submit the offline build changes upstream? the upstream is essentially dead | 12:08:07 |
