| 16 Jan 2025 |
 matthewcroughan | I also find that putting ssh keys in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys doesn't work anymore | 16:32:19 |
 Gaétan Lepage | On the ARM box ? I am not managing it at all. | 16:32:36 |
| Gaétan Lepage | zowoq is kindly operating the infra. | 16:32:55 |
| matthewcroughan | zfs, nice | 16:44:13 |
 Jonas Chevalier | Do you have any KVM or remote hands to reboot the machine? That's the main thing that was holding us back from liberodark's offer. If the host goes down and we have no good way to reboot / replace it quickly, then the community gets stuck and it creates more overhead and stress for us (mainly zowoq). | 17:07:14 |
| matthewcroughan | yes to both, I manage everything with pikvm running nixos itself | 17:14:54 |
| matthewcroughan | almost all of my own machines have this now | 17:15:02 |
| matthewcroughan | and I live close to the space | 17:15:21 |
| Jonas Chevalier | nice | 18:14:43 |
 liberodark | Hi,
I still have no answer about the Ryzen builder.
If you are interested I invite you to tell me before 01/20/2025 it will be transferred to other tasks.
As for a KVM it can indeed be set up.
I just specified that there is not one by default but a KVM can be set up.
Best Regards | 19:11:49 |
| liberodark | I haven't seen any ping about this, no information was given to me about a refusal.
So I should take your message as a validation of a refusal? | 19:13:06 |
| Jonas Chevalier | hey liberodark, thanks a lot for stepping up and sorry if it comes off as not appreciating your offer. we were mulling over what to do because the overhead in cost and time might not be worth it, and then i got distracted by work. iff we go with a community-hosted solution, i think it will be easier at matthew's datacenter because i personally know him. | 19:36:26 |
| liberodark | No problem I understand perfectly and I don't take it badly ^^
If you want opinions on the services we host for nix you can ask the ofborg team. | 19:38:05 |
| Jonas Chevalier | nice, i didn't know that. are those also x86_64 runners? | 19:39:14 |
| liberodark | And if you take another solution no worries.
But I do this to help and it is also to help Gaétan Lepage who helped me a lot. | 19:39:36 |
| liberodark | And as a reminder, he is the one who told me about your builder problem.
So it is indeed relevant to choose what suits you best. | 19:40:49 |
| liberodark | Yep only x86_64 for now | 19:41:27 |
| liberodark | Probably other later if is needed. | 19:41:42 |
| 17 Jan 2025 |
|  emily joined the room. | 22:51:31 |
| 18 Jan 2025 |
| Gaétan Lepage | zowoq in general, how busy are the CI builders ? I am not refering to the community builders but the one used in the CI of nix-community projects). | 22:49:13 |
|  Ihar Hrachyshka joined the room. | 22:50:27 |
| 19 Jan 2025 |
 zowoq | Sometimes not very busy but in the days after a staging merging in nixpkgs they get hammered, also busier during the month or two when both release branches are supported. | 00:20:32 |
| zowoq | https://prometheus.nix-community.org/ metrics are public if that is helpful but only go back 30 days. I set up grafana instance a while ago but I haven't got around to actually setting up any dashboards yet. | 00:24:39 |
| Gaétan Lepage | Ok thank you for those details. We are thinking about running a few more jobs on the nixvim project. I wouldn't want to stress the infrastructure.
But it should be fine as this addition won't cause a significant increase in load.
Basically, it's more a matter of running our CI more often against nixpkgs channels. | 00:42:17 |
|  sinan changed their profile picture. | 14:02:51 |
| 21 Jan 2025 |
|  natsukium joined the room. | 09:25:55 |
|  Joel joined the room. | 12:11:46 |
|  Roberto Abdelkader Martínez Pérez joined the room. | 13:19:30 |
|  @luxzi:matrix.org changed their display name from luxzi (they/them) to luxzi (they/she). | 18:04:32 |
|  Stéphan joined the room. | 18:30:54 |
