!PbtOpdWBSRFbEZRLIf:numtide.com

Nix Community Projects

594 Members
Meta discussions related to https://nix-community.org. (For project specific discussions use github issues or projects own matrix channel). Need help from an admin? Open an issue on https://github.com/nix-community/infra/issues155 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
15 Jan 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexano, plain nix-build01:14:53
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/37390301:16:34
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily ++ lib.optionals stdenv.hostPlatform.isDarwin [ darwin.apple_sdk.frameworks.AppKit ]; can be dropped entirely fwiw (it has no effect on the build) 01:17:36
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilynot sure why you'd get sandbox size issues even with the sandbox off though01:17:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaare you getting it as well? šŸ˜„ 01:20:37
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa ok, so --option sandbox does not seem to propagate to the remote builder 01:24:59
@hexa:lossy.networkhexait works when passing it on the remote builder itself01:25:12
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyah, I was busy downloading a bunch of crates to test :)01:30:16
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily it might be a ? option you can use on the remote builder URL 01:30:23
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydunno, I don't have the builders set as remote builders since I don't trust them01:30:34
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI use the comunity builders through shell aliases šŸ™‚ 01:53:33
@perchun:matrix.orgPerchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] if I recognize this issue correctly, it happens to be on huge symlinkJoins in nixpkgs-review, and they work around it by using pkgs.buildEnv
https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/blob/b3ccb2adef4b173a1f81fb258492a8a185a224ad/nixpkgs_review/nix/review-shell.nix#L40
10:20:02
@perchun:matrix.orgPerchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead]not sure what is causing this issue on your package10:20:18
@perchun:matrix.orgPerchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead]* not sure what is causing this issue in your package10:20:23
@katexochen:matrix.orgPaul Meyer (katexochen) joined the room.10:23:07
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (utc+3) to SomeoneSerge.19:02:42
@pistache:systemli.orgpistache changed their profile picture.22:06:54
@pistache:systemli.orgpistache changed their profile picture.22:07:34
16 Jan 2025
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanis aarch64.nixos.community down?13:28:58
@glepage:matrix.orgGaƩtan LepageNope13:37:18
@glepage:matrix.orgGaƩtan LepageOh yes13:37:37
@glepage:matrix.orgGaƩtan Lepage It was a system provided by Equinix systems. They ended the sponsorship at the end of 2024.
Since then, nix-community has started to rent a new ARM builder.
13:38:19
@glepage:matrix.orgGaƩtan Lepage https://nix-community.org/community-builder/ 13:38:28
@glepage:matrix.orgGaƩtan Lepage * It was a system provided by Equinix systems. They ended the sponsorship at the end of 2024.
Since then, nix-community has started to rent a new ARM builder.
--> aarch64-build-box.nix-community.org
13:38:51
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan FWIW if you guys buy or subsidize the cost of an ampere machine we can host it in our new hackspace Birkenhack near to Liverpool on a gigabit connection 13:40:28
@glepage:matrix.orgGaĆ©tan Lepage The current box is 169€/month. It means that over two year we would have paid for a ~4k€ system.
Might be worth to consider buying idk... Of course the reliability/trust aspect has to be considered.
13:42:43
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan I expect it to be very reliable, and you can trust me :) 14:23:12
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanMy space is going to have fido2 door locks14:23:18
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughanI think the rent is pretty good though if the machine is used a lot14:25:21
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughan GaƩtan Lepage: did you guys get rid of the impermanence setup? 16:32:06

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6