| 18 May 2025 |
 danth | In reply to @zowoq:matrix.org
Yes, certainly. I've accepted the org invite, presumably you're ready for me to send the transfer now? Could you also invite awwpotato and trueNAHO into the team please? | 01:48:21 |
 zowoq | Yes, you can transfer it whenever you're ready. Github usually downgrades permissions on the repo, I'll restore you're admin access after it is transferred. I've sent the other two invites. | 01:52:17 |
| zowoq | * Yes, you can transfer it whenever you're ready. Github usually downgrades permissions on the repo, I'll restore your admin access after it is transferred. I've sent the other two invites. | 01:52:30 |
| danth | We also have a GitHub app installed on the repo, do you know if the transfer will remove that? | 01:59:15 |
| zowoq | No, github apps should be fine. | 02:03:24 |
| danth | Should be good to go then :)) | 02:03:41 |
 @awwpotato:envs.net | the stylix matrix room #stylix:danth.me should probably be added to nixos space | 22:13:45 |
| 19 May 2025 |
|  flx joined the room. | 00:19:53 |
 Winter | do we have any sort of setting that makes it so that merge commits are authored by the PR author? see e.g. https://github.com/nix-community/fenix/commit/c3c27e603b0d9b5aac8a16236586696338856fbb | 17:43:44 |
| Winter | * do we have any sort of setting set on the org level that makes it so that merge commits are authored by the PR author? see e.g. https://github.com/nix-community/fenix/commit/c3c27e603b0d9b5aac8a16236586696338856fbb | 17:43:52 |
|  @orzklv:floss.uz left the room. | 18:03:53 |
 FliegendeWurst | depends on which merge method was used | 19:03:09 |
| FliegendeWurst | that looks like a squash or rebase merge, which is authored by the PR author | 19:03:19 |
| FliegendeWurst | * that was a squash merge, which is authored by the PR author | 19:03:47 |
| FliegendeWurst | * that is a squash merge, which is authored by the PR author | 19:03:55 |
| Winter | In reply to @fliegendewurst:matrix.org
that looks like a squash or rebase merge, which is authored by the PR author i didn’t think squash merges had the “Merge pull
request …” prefix? | 19:25:39 |
| Winter | definitely not in the squash merges i’ve seen | 19:25:46 |
| FliegendeWurst | maybe it depends on the repository settings | 19:26:27 |
| FliegendeWurst | But it has to be a squash merge. The merged commit has only one parent | 19:26:41 |
| danth | In reply to @winter:catgirl.cloud
i didn’t think squash merges had the “Merge pull
request …” prefix? There's an option to change the default message in the repository settings, although none of these sound like that specific format | 19:35:58 |
| danth | Redacted or Malformed Event | 19:36:07 |
| danth | (forgot we can't send screenshots here, but hopefully u get the idea) | 19:36:48 |
 emily | pretty sure that's not a thing | 21:42:54 |
| emily | not sure what happened there – I suspect manually editing the title of a squash merge | 21:43:16 |
| 20 May 2025 |
 Ihar Hrachyshka | Redacted or Malformed Event | 01:08:12 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | * from nixpkgs manual: "A more formal definition of the platform support tiers is provided in RFC046, but has not been fully implemented yet."
wonder if this should be "fully implemented" for the sake better standing of aarch64-darwin in the eyes of packagers that don't care; and what it would take to make the official tier list a reality (the one in RFC046 is wildly out of date)
ah should have just searched through PRs!.. I guess it's: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/401821 | 01:09:09 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | * ~~from nixpkgs manual: "A more formal definition of the platform support tiers is provided in RFC046, but has not been fully implemented yet."~~
~~wonder if this should be "fully implemented" for the sake better standing of aarch64-darwin in the eyes of packagers that don't care; and what it would take to make the official tier list a reality (the one in RFC046 is wildly out of date)~~
ah should have just searched through PRs!.. I guess it's: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/401821 | 01:09:22 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | * from nixpkgs manual: "A more formal definition of the platform support tiers is provided in RFC046, but has not been fully implemented yet."
wonder if this should be "fully implemented" for the sake better standing of aarch64-darwin in the eyes of packagers that don't care; and what it would take to make the official tier list a reality (the one in RFC046 is wildly out of date)
ah should have just searched through PRs!.. I guess it's: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/401821
| 01:09:33 |
| Winter | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
not sure what happened there – I suspect manually editing the title of a squash merge probably | 01:53:22 |
| Winter | you’d just think squash merges would properly set committer nonetheless | 01:53:56 |
