!QCCCSJHEsTIfozrZxz:nixos.org

Nix + Go

233 Members
Go packaging for and with Nixpkgs. | Be excellent to each other.48 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
11 May 2024
@brumik1:matrix.org@brumik1:matrix.org

Thank you for the answer!

PostInstall is part of mkDerivation right? Can I do there writeShellApplication? Some approximate example would help me greatly in my failing attempts

10:10:31
@diamondburned:matrix.orgDiamond (it/she) `nix
buildGoModule {
// ...
shellHook =
}
23:26:15
@diamondburned:matrix.orgDiamond (it/she)omg23:26:17
@diamondburned:matrix.orgDiamond (it/she)
buildGoModule {
    # ...

	nativeBuildInputs = with pkgs; [
		makeWrapper
	];

    shellHook = ''
		wrapProgram $out/bin/progname --set PATH ${lib.makeBinPath with pkgs; [
			# runtime packages go here
		]}
	'';
}
23:27:48
@diamondburned:matrix.orgDiamond (it/she)
buildGoModule {
  # ...

  nativeBuildInputs = with pkgs; [
    makeWrapper
  ];

  shellHook = ''
    wrapProgram $out/bin/progname --set PATH ${lib.makeBinPath with pkgs; [
      # runtime packages go here
    ]}
  '';
}
23:28:15
@reese:cyberia.clubreese (they/them) left the room.23:30:54
@dnrix:matrix.orgdnrI like to do this by having the go program run things by absolute path. You can set this up by taking the binary name from a global and then overriding it with linker flags23:45:28
@dnrix:matrix.orgdnre.g. https://github.com/dnr/nix-sandwich/blob/main/default.nix#L14-L2023:45:36
12 May 2024
@diamondburned:matrix.orgDiamond (it/she)woah00:02:50
@diamondburned:matrix.orgDiamond (it/she)why?00:02:50
@diamondburned:matrix.orgDiamond (it/she)this is a really cool project though00:03:34
@brumik1:matrix.org@brumik1:matrix.orgI might be mistaken here, but shellHook isnt supposed to be run when entering the shell instead when you build the package? 09:32:57
@brumik1:matrix.org@brumik1:matrix.orgI do agree the project is really cool dnr! 09:34:27
@brumik1:matrix.org@brumik1:matrix.org I ended up with using postFixup. I hope it is not antipattern 09:47:03
@dnrix:matrix.orgdnr
In reply to @diamondburned:matrix.org
why?
You mean why do it that way? It just seems cleaner to me than using a wrapper. There's just one binary and no script. The disadvantage I guess is that you can't override things by messing with PATH and calling the wrapped binary directly
19:05:41
@dnrix:matrix.orgdnrAnd thanks. I've actually been working on an even better version of that idea. I'm planning to announce it soon19:07:55

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9