!QCCCSJHEsTIfozrZxz:nixos.org

Nix + Go

240 Members
Go packaging for and with Nixpkgs. | Be excellent to each other.52 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Jan 2023
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaas to not be stuck on 1.19 when it goes eol during 23.05s lifecycle15:13:17
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgmakes sense15:13:32
@hexa:lossy.networkhexajust want to make sure someone is aware, because during the last releases go maintenance was always a bit behind15:14:06
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand needed to be pushed15:14:15
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * and needed to be poked alot15:14:31
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgwell, hopefully we can improve it :D15:47:06
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgmaybe it's worth adding the RCs for now15:50:18
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgor.. at least making a diff for them 15:50:30
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.org oh 1.20 is already there \o/ 15:52:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe default go needs to be migrated 🙂16:48:23
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa * the default go needs to be migrated once it is released16:48:33
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI think that's the actual work 16:49:03
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgcool16:49:36
19 Jan 2023
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orghttps://go.dev/blog/survey2023-q115:21:09
24 Jan 2023
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orghttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/212354 15:23:44
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgwonder if we will actually need that15:23:50
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧if sourcehut is continue with its plan, then yes15:49:17
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgright, but there is some over-email interactions now that might change things15:54:55
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orghttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3431466815:55:25
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgtime will tell15:55:31
25 Jan 2023
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orghm, there are a number of pull requests like this one: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/21259618:15:18
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgwhich add buildGoModule support by pulling in a patch from a fork that isn't upstream'd (and no indication if upstream has been contacted - i didn't look too hard though)18:15:57
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgthat feels pretty icky to me18:16:05
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgdo we want to move things to buildGoModules that bad? 18:16:18
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgreally need to get the other go maintainers in here :D18:21:59
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.org invited @kalbasit:matrix.orgkalbasit.18:23:53
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.org invited @joerg:thalheim.ioMic92.18:23:55
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 joined the room.18:25:15
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orghio!18:25:23
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgmk, seems a number of them are upstream'd or "new" upstream'd18:48:02

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9