| 11 May 2024 |
 @brumik1:matrix.org | Thank you for the answer!
PostInstall is part of mkDerivation right? Can I do there writeShellApplication? Some approximate example would help me greatly in my failing attempts
| 10:10:31 |
 Diamond (it/she) | `nix
buildGoModule {
// ...
shellHook =
} | 23:26:15 |
| Diamond (it/she) | omg | 23:26:17 |
| Diamond (it/she) | buildGoModule {
# ...
nativeBuildInputs = with pkgs; [
makeWrapper
];
shellHook = ''
wrapProgram $out/bin/progname --set PATH ${lib.makeBinPath with pkgs; [
# runtime packages go here
]}
'';
}
| 23:27:48 |
| Diamond (it/she) | buildGoModule {
# ...
nativeBuildInputs = with pkgs; [
makeWrapper
];
shellHook = ''
wrapProgram $out/bin/progname --set PATH ${lib.makeBinPath with pkgs; [
# runtime packages go here
]}
'';
}
| 23:28:15 |
|  reese (they/them) left the room. | 23:30:54 |
 dnr | I like to do this by having the go program run things by absolute path. You can set this up by taking the binary name from a global and then overriding it with linker flags | 23:45:28 |
| dnr | e.g. https://github.com/dnr/nix-sandwich/blob/main/default.nix#L14-L20 | 23:45:36 |
| 12 May 2024 |
| Diamond (it/she) | woah | 00:02:50 |
| Diamond (it/she) | why? | 00:02:50 |
| Diamond (it/she) | this is a really cool project though | 00:03:34 |
| @brumik1:matrix.org | I might be mistaken here, but shellHook isnt supposed to be run when entering the shell instead when you build the package? | 09:32:57 |
| @brumik1:matrix.org | I do agree the project is really cool dnr! | 09:34:27 |
| @brumik1:matrix.org | I ended up with using postFixup. I hope it is not antipattern | 09:47:03 |
| dnr | In reply to @diamondburned:matrix.org
why? You mean why do it that way? It just seems cleaner to me than using a wrapper. There's just one binary and no script. The disadvantage I guess is that you can't override things by messing with PATH and calling the wrapped binary directly | 19:05:41 |
| dnr | And thanks. I've actually been working on an even better version of that idea. I'm planning to announce it soon | 19:07:55 |
| 13 May 2024 |
|  Frédéric Christ 🌴 29.04.-13.05. changed their display name from Frédéric Christ 🌴 29.04.-13.05. to Frédéric Christ. | 14:45:38 |
| 14 May 2024 |
|  @kaya:catnip.ee joined the room. | 07:25:31 |
|  @azahi:azahi.cc joined the room. | 10:31:33 |
| @kaya:catnip.ee changed their profile picture. | 10:49:24 |
| 15 May 2024 |
|  @raboof:matrix.org joined the room. | 12:00:55 |
| @raboof:matrix.org | hi! I'm trying to run guac. made a first stab at it in https://github.com/raboof/guac/commit/b4251b9719e98e2a8b689088d71304d36250019d , but building it gives me some errors like cannot find module providing package github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/xml: import lookup disabled by -mod=vendor. Indeed they don't seem to be in the gomod2nix.toml generated by gomod2nix generate. Any ideas what could be the matter? | 12:02:48 |
| @raboof:matrix.org | github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/xml indeed isn't in go.sum, even after go mod tidy | 12:36:45 |
 Paul Meyer (katexochen) | In reply to @raboof:matrix.org
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/xml indeed isn't in go.sum, even after go mod tidy Well, that's not a module but a package, right? https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/tree/v1.26.1/aws/protocol/xml
Seems to belong to the module github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2 | 12:46:41 |
| @raboof:matrix.org | gotcha - sorry, my go is rusty (no pun intended 😆). that's a good lead, digging further. | 13:05:20 |
| @raboof:matrix.org | https://github.com/nix-community/gomod2nix/pull/158 🎉 | 14:07:48 |
| 16 May 2024 |
| Frédéric Christ 🌴 29.04.-13.05. changed their display name from Frédéric Christ to Frédéric Christ 🌴 17.05.. | 14:30:07 |
|  leonardo left the room. | 21:04:56 |
| 17 May 2024 |
 hexa | does the go builder have an interface for disabling tests? | 08:21:48 |
| hexa | I've usually gone and just yeeted individual test files, which seems rather coarse | 08:22:04 |
