| 1 Nov 2023 |
 @qbit:tapenet.org | i think they cut a bad release | 15:15:09 |
 bumperboat | go build works fine | 15:20:31 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | go mod tidy fails though | 15:21:57 |
| bumperboat | ah - should i submit an issue with that to them? | 15:23:18 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | i am not sure :D | 15:23:48 |
| bumperboat | :) | 15:23:56 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | it looks like the "/mocks/" stuff gets created.. then removed later on | 15:26:05 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | they are def doing some funky stuff with the build | 15:26:49 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | like the tests point to things that don't exist.. | 15:27:20 |
| bumperboat | thanks for your help 🙏I put in an issue with upstream to see if they have ideas 🤗 | 15:59:01 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | np! sorry i couldn't resolve it :D | 16:03:09 |
| bumperboat | you were super helpful thanks! | 16:03:22 |
| 2 Nov 2023 |
|  netthier joined the room. | 11:40:22 |
| netthier | I'm trying to submit an update PR for the kluctl package, but it's refusing to build. I'm struggling to find any relevant results for the error on Google, and the error does not occur when building the package manually using the official instructions.
error: builder for '/nix/store/jqkx3yj3q2x73k5y0ch5pq0g0q3d1kag-kluctl-2.22.0.drv' failed with exit code 1;
last 10 log lines:
> Building subPackage ./e2e
> Building subPackage ./e2e/test-utils
> Building subPackage ./e2e/test-utils/http-server
> Building subPackage ./e2e/test-utils/port-tool
> Building subPackage ./e2e/test-utils/test-helm-chart
> Building subPackage ./e2e/test_project
> Building subPackage ./e2e/test_resources
> Building subPackage ./install/controller
> Building subPackage ./internal/ipfs-exchange-info
> main module (github.com/kluctl/kluctl/v2) does not contain package github.com/kluctl/kluctl/v2/internal/ipfs-exchange-info
For full logs, run 'nix log /nix/store/jqkx3yj3q2x73k5y0ch5pq0g0q3d1kag-kluctl-2.22.0.drv'.
Anyone know what could be going on here? | 11:40:54 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | netthier: is it supposed to build test_* packages? | 12:32:33 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | if not use subPackages = [ "stuff" ]; | 12:32:57 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | to specify what you want to build | 12:33:02 |
| netthier | In reply to@qbit:tapenet.org
if not use subPackages = [ "stuff" ]; Thanks, specifying exclusively the cmd package did indeed result in a successful build | 13:09:08 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | swoot | 13:16:00 |
| bumperboat | so, the resticprofile repo uses go generate ./... to generate the mocks - if I put that in a preBuild - it allows the build phase to finish to where it outputs the vendorHash - once I put the hash in I can remove the preBuild and it builds | 15:30:51 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | gross | 15:31:29 |
| bumperboat | im not sure why buildGoModule doesnt just do a go build | 15:32:44 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | i'd for sure leave a comment in the derivation for someone that is updating it | 15:33:16 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | or maybe check if vendorHash = "", then do the preBuild step .. | 15:33:32 |
| bumperboat | yep i left in a comment | 15:34:00 |
| bumperboat | im hoping there is another way to not build the mocks - maybe with submodule as the mock binaries get put in the bin dir in the store | 15:34:55 |
| bumperboat | *subPackage | 15:36:38 |
| 3 Nov 2023 |
|  mib 🥐 changed their profile picture. | 13:52:50 |
| 10 Nov 2023 |
|  globin joined the room. | 00:49:55 |
|  paul / pfz4 joined the room. | 16:44:35 |
