!QCCCSJHEsTIfozrZxz:nixos.org

Nix + Go

219 Members
Go packaging for and with Nixpkgs. | Be excellent to each other.46 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
3 Mar 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900@puckipedia14:35:27
@k900:0upti.meK900One of the Lix maintainers 14:35:45
@k900:0upti.meK900And bearer of cursed Go knowledge m14:35:55
@k900:0upti.meK900* And bearer of cursed Go knowledge14:36:06
@qbit:tapenet.org@qbit:tapenet.orgah, sweet14:39:05
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧the go things in there are basic :)23:10:17
5 Mar 2025
@hiengyen:matrix.orgTrungHieu joined the room.03:44:08
@ygt:matrix.org@ygt:matrix.org joined the room.13:31:56
@ygt:matrix.org@ygt:matrix.org Is there a recommended way to deal with projects that don't provide a go.sum when using buildGoModule? 13:36:45
@ygt:matrix.org@ygt:matrix.orgContext: Trying to package https://github.com/deadc0de6/gocatcli13:40:29
@katexochen:matrix.orgPaul Meyer (katexochen)I'd say clone the project, generate the go.sum file, put it beside your nix source (nixpkgs, if you are talking about a package you want to upstream), and copy it into source in postPatch.13:40:51
@katexochen:matrix.orgPaul Meyer (katexochen)But I'd also ask upsteam to lock their dependencies, I say not having a go.sum is really bad practice for a Go project.13:43:33
@ygt:matrix.org@ygt:matrix.orgThank you13:43:45
@ygt:matrix.org@ygt:matrix.orgAlready done. I think I'll wait for their answer13:44:00
@katexochen:matrix.orgPaul Meyer (katexochen) nadir: feel free to request my review if you open a pr against nixpkgs :) 13:44:56
@ygt:matrix.org@ygt:matrix.orgThank you, that's very nice. I'll do that should it come to that :)13:45:57
7 Mar 2025
@nazarewk:matrix.orgkdnany ideas?13:02:38
@nazarewk:matrix.orgkdnseems like any kind of Go tool builds forever on my machine15:26:20

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9