| 6 May 2025 |
 hexa | default_config, yeah, if you configure all the actually required components | 19:07:50 |
| hexa | services.home-assistant.config = {
# opinionated default_config
bluetooth = {};
config = {};
dhcp = {};
logbook = {};
history = {};
media_source = {};
mobile_app = {};
person = {};
scene = {};
system_health = {};
ssdp = {};
sun = {};
script = {};
tag = {};
timer = {};
zeroconf = {};
| 19:09:06 |
| 7 May 2025 |
|  christopherg98 joined the room. | 22:28:58 |
| 8 May 2025 |
 dotlambda | @hexa I'm done with the Home Assistant branch. Feel free to rebase and merge (make sure package drops come after the HA update) or to wait until frigate is fixed. | 16:33:13 |
| hexa | I just posted a review report | 16:33:34 |
| dotlambda | I saw that. Looks good to me | 16:33:57 |
| hexa | also lol @ sbomnix | 16:33:58 |
| hexa | we break it and leave it better than before | 16:34:04 |
| hexa | https://github.com/dermotduffy/hass-web-proxy-lib/issues/65 | 16:34:36 |
| hexa | I have not yet followed the hass reference upwards | 16:34:52 |
| hexa | too many sidequests | 16:35:01 |
| dotlambda | Actually I just pushed a fix for the ring component | 16:36:48 |
| dotlambda | But now I'm really done | 16:37:33 |
| hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/405025#issuecomment-2863461715 | 16:37:43 |
| hexa | 🙂 | 16:37:44 |
| hexa | protobuf bumps are always to violent | 16:38:14 |
| hexa | smh | 16:38:15 |
| hexa | that is the exact same package you touched, so we can close | 16:39:52 |
 K900 | Can't spell protobuf without uf | 16:39:58 |
| K900 | Or something | 16:40:00 |
| * hexa nods | 16:40:06 |
| dotlambda | We now support more than 92% of all components 🎉 | 16:43:58 |
| hexa | whew 😄 | 16:44:53 |
| dotlambda | Btw, baloob was on the Home Assistant podcast and said something about cleaning up the esphome build pipeline. I didn't do any research but maybe there's hope of turning platformio into something that's more compatible with Nixpkgs | 16:45:39 |
| dotlambda | I guess we need to go lobby upstream | 16:45:47 |
| hexa | interesting | 16:46:17 |
| hexa | https://hasspodcast.io/ha184/ this one? | 16:46:39 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
https://hasspodcast.io/ha184/ this one? Yes. But it was just a remark in passing | 16:47:17 |
| hexa | ok | 16:47:22 |
| dotlambda | If anyone happens to listen it in the future, please let us know the timestamp of the esphome remark | 16:56:49 |
