| 21 Feb 2025 |
K900 | Uhh | 07:12:38 |
K900 | Nope | 07:12:39 |
K900 | OK I just turned it off lol | 08:44:40 |
K900 | I never really had a use case for it anyway | 08:44:46 |
oddlama | That behavior seems to be new in 7.0.0 | 16:21:11 |
| 22 Feb 2025 |
@hexa:lossy.network | https://meshstack.de/post/home-assistant/zigbee-table-routing-vs-source-routing-zha/ | 14:00:04 |
@hexa:lossy.network | Redacted or Malformed Event | 14:00:55 |
@hexa:lossy.network | table routing means every zigbee node makes its own routing decision when forwarding | 14:01:38 |
@hexa:lossy.network | source routing means the coordinator determines the path through the mesh | 14:02:11 |
@hexa:lossy.network | zigbee2mqtt seems to default to source routing, while zha seems to defautl to table routing | 14:02:36 |
@hexa:lossy.network | if those are the canonical terms for zigbee | 14:02:49 |
@hexa:lossy.network | also … https://mini-rack.jeffgeerling.com/ | 14:07:38 |
teto | interesting, it might explain why my zigbee network got all so slow when I reagenced my devices around the building (using z2m) | 23:54:05 |
| 23 Feb 2025 |
mattleon | I think I've traced it down to https://github.com/home-assistant-libs/python-matter-server/pull/1014, but I'm not yet sure whether the issue is in something NixOS related yet, so I'll keep digging. | 00:46:49 |
mattleon | Ouch, the package used has been abandoned for years: https://github.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites?tab=readme-ov-file#unmaintained | 00:51:55 |
@hexa:lossy.network | huh, I don't think that is the one | 00:53:32 |
@hexa:lossy.network | https://pypi.org/project/atomicwrites-homeassistant/ | 00:53:55 |
@hexa:lossy.network | they just never update the metadata 🤔 | 00:54:02 |
@hexa:lossy.network | otoh | 00:54:16 |
@hexa:lossy.network |  Download image.png | 00:54:17 |
@hexa:lossy.network | ❯ diff -r atomicwrites*
Only in atomicwrites-1.4.1: atomicwrites.egg-info
Only in atomicwrites-homeassistant-1.4.1: atomicwrites_homeassistant.egg-info
diff '--color=auto' -r atomicwrites-1.4.1/PKG-INFO atomicwrites-homeassistant-1.4.1/PKG-INFO
1,2c1,2
< Metadata-Version: 1.2
< Name: atomicwrites
---
> Metadata-Version: 2.1
> Name: atomicwrites-homeassistant
9,136d8
< Description: ===================
< python-atomicwrites
< ===================
<
< .. image:: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites.svg?branch=master
< :target: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites
< .. image:: https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/vadc4le3c27to59x/branch/master?svg=true
< :target: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/untitaker/python-atomicwrites/branch/master
< .. image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/python-atomicwrites/badge/?version=latest
< :target: https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/?badge=latest
< :alt: Documentation Status
<
< **Atomic file writes.**
<
< .. code-block:: python
<
< from atomicwrites import atomic_write
<
< with atomic_write('foo.txt', overwrite=True) as f:
< f.write('Hello world.')
< # "foo.txt" doesn't exist yet.
<
< # Now it does.
<
< See `API documentation <https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#api>`_ for more
< low-level interfaces.
<
< Features that distinguish it from other similar libraries (see `Alternatives and Credit`_):
<
< - Race-free assertion that the target file doesn't yet exist. This can be
< controlled with the ``overwrite`` parameter.
<
< - Windows support, although not well-tested. The MSDN resources are not very
< explicit about which operations are atomic. I'm basing my assumptions off `a
< comment
< <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsdesktop/en-US/449bb49d-8acc-48dc-a46f-0760ceddbfc3/movefileexmovefilereplaceexisting-ntfs-same-volume-atomic?forum=windowssdk#a239bc26-eaf0-4920-9f21-440bd2be9cc8>`_
< by `Doug Cook
< <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/doug%20e.%20cook>`_, who appears
< to be a Microsoft employee:
<
< Question: Is MoveFileEx atomic if the existing and new
< files are both on the same drive?
<
< The simple answer is "usually, but in some cases it will silently fall-back
< to a non-atomic method, so don't count on it".
<
< The implementation of MoveFileEx looks something like this: [...]
<
< The problem is if the rename fails, you might end up with a CopyFile, which
< is definitely not atomic.
<
< If you really need atomic-or-nothing, you can try calling
< NtSetInformationFile, which is unsupported but is much more likely to be
< atomic.
<
< - Simple high-level API that wraps a very flexible class-based API.
<
< - Consistent error handling across platforms.
<
<
< How it works
< ============
<
< It uses a temporary file in the same directory as the given path. This ensures
< that the temporary file resides on the same filesystem.
<
< The temporary file will then be atomically moved to the target location: On
< POSIX, it will use ``rename`` if files should be overwritten, otherwise a
< combination of ``link`` and ``unlink``. On Windows, it uses MoveFileEx_ through
< stdlib's ``ctypes`` with the appropriate flags.
<
< Note that with ``link`` and ``unlink``, there's a timewindow where the file
< might be available under two entries in the filesystem: The name of the
< temporary file, and the name of the target file.
<
< Also note that the permissions of the target file may change this way. In some
< situations a ``chmod`` can be issued without any concurrency problems, but
< since that is not always the case, this library doesn't do it by itself.
<
< .. _MoveFileEx: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365240%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
<
< fsync
< -----
<
< On POSIX, ``fsync`` is invoked on the temporary file after it is written (to
< flush file content and metadata), and on the parent directory after the file is
< moved (to flush filename).
<
< ``fsync`` does not take care of disks' internal buffers, but there don't seem
< to be any standard POSIX APIs for that. On OS X, ``fcntl`` is used with
< ``F_FULLFSYNC`` instead of ``fsync`` for that reason.
<
< On Windows, `_commit <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17618685.aspx>`_
< is used, but there are no guarantees about disk internal buffers.
<
< Alternatives and Credit
< =======================
<
< Atomicwrites is directly inspired by the following libraries (and shares a
< minimal amount of code):
<
< - The Trac project's `utility functions
< <http://www.edgewall.org/docs/tags-trac-0.11.7/epydoc/trac.util-pysrc.html>`_,
< also used in `Werkzeug <http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/>`_ and
< `mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile
< <https://github.com/mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile>`_. The idea to use
< ``ctypes`` instead of ``PyWin32`` originated there.
<
< - `abarnert/fatomic <https://github.com/abarnert/fatomic>`_. Windows support
< (based on ``PyWin32``) was originally taken from there.
<
< Other alternatives to atomicwrites include:
<
< - `sashka/atomicfile <https://github.com/sashka/atomicfile>`_. Originally I
< considered using that, but at the time it was lacking a lot of features I
< needed (Windows support, overwrite-parameter, overriding behavior through
< subclassing).
<
< - The `Boltons library collection <https://github.com/mahmoud/boltons>`_
< features a class for atomic file writes, which seems to have a very similar
< ``overwrite`` parameter. It is lacking Windows support though.
<
< License
< =======
<
< Licensed under the MIT, see ``LICENSE``.
<
< Platform: UNKNOWN
147a20,149
> License-File: LICENSE
>
> ===================
> python-atomicwrites
> ===================
>
> .. image:: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites.svg?branch=master
> :target: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites
> .. image:: https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/vadc4le3c27to59x/branch/master?svg=true
> :target: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/untitaker/python-atomicwrites/branch/master
> .. image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/python-atomicwrites/badge/?version=latest
> :target: https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/?badge=latest
> :alt: Documentation Status
>
> **Atomic file writes.**
>
> Fork because the original package is unmaintained.
>
> .. code-block:: python
>
> from atomicwrites import atomic_write
>
> with atomic_write('foo.txt', overwrite=True) as f:
> f.write('Hello world.')
> # "foo.txt" doesn't exist yet.
>
> # Now it does.
>
> See `API documentation <https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#api>`_ for more
> low-level interfaces.
>
> Features that distinguish it from other similar libraries (see `Alternatives and Credit`_):
>
> - Race-free assertion that the target file doesn't yet exist. This can be
> controlled with the ``overwrite`` parameter.
>
> - Windows support, although not well-tested. The MSDN resources are not very
> explicit about which operations are atomic. I'm basing my assumptions off `a
> comment
> <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsdesktop/en-US/449bb49d-8acc-48dc-a46f-0760ceddbfc3/movefileexmovefilereplaceexisting-ntfs-same-volume-atomic?forum=windowssdk#a239bc26-eaf0-4920-9f21-440bd2be9cc8>`_
> by `Doug Cook
> <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/doug%20e.%20cook>`_, who appears
> to be a Microsoft employee:
>
> Question: Is MoveFileEx atomic if the existing and new
> files are both on the same drive?
>
> The simple answer is "usually, but in some cases it will silently fall-back
> to a non-atomic method, so don't count on it".
>
> The implementation of MoveFileEx looks something like this: [...]
>
> The problem is if the rename fails, you might end up with a CopyFile, which
> is definitely not atomic.
>
> If you really need atomic-or-nothing, you can try calling
> NtSetInformationFile, which is unsupported but is much more likely to be
> atomic.
>
> - Simple high-level API that wraps a very flexible class-based API.
>
> - Consistent error handling across platforms.
>
>
> How it works
> ============
>
> It uses a temporary file in the same directory as the given path. This ensures
> that the temporary file resides on the same filesystem.
>
> The temporary file will then be atomically moved to the target location: On
> POSIX, it will use ``rename`` if files should be overwritten, otherwise a
> combination of ``link`` and ``unlink``. On Windows, it uses MoveFileEx_ through
> stdlib's ``ctypes`` with the appropriate flags.
>
> Note that with ``link`` and ``unlink``, there's a timewindow where the file
> might be available under two entries in the filesystem: The name of the
> temporary file, and the name of the target file.
>
> Also note that the permissions of the target file may change this way. In some
> situations a ``chmod`` can be issued without any concurrency problems, but
> since that is not always the case, this library doesn't do it by itself.
>
> .. _MoveFileEx: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365240%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>
> fsync
> -----
>
> On POSIX, ``fsync`` is invoked on the temporary file after it is written (to
> flush file content and metadata), and on the parent directory after the file is
> moved (to flush filename).
>
> ``fsync`` does not take care of disks' internal buffers, but there don't seem
> to be any standard POSIX APIs for that. On OS X, ``fcntl`` is used with
> ``F_FULLFSYNC`` instead of ``fsync`` for that reason.
>
> On Windows, `_commit <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17618685.aspx>`_
> is used, but there are no guarantees about disk internal buffers.
>
> Alternatives and Credit
> =======================
>
> Atomicwrites is directly inspired by the following libraries (and shares a
> minimal amount of code):
>
> - The Trac project's `utility functions
> <http://www.edgewall.org/docs/tags-trac-0.11.7/epydoc/trac.util-pysrc.html>`_,
> also used in `Werkzeug <http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/>`_ and
> `mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile
> <https://github.com/mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile>`_. The idea to use
> ``ctypes`` instead of ``PyWin32`` originated there.
>
> - `abarnert/fatomic <https://github.com/abarnert/fatomic>`_. Windows support
> (based on ``PyWin32``) was originally taken from there.
>
> Other alternatives to atomicwrites include:
>
> - `sashka/atomicfile <https://github.com/sashka/atomicfile>`_. Originally I
> considered using that, but at the time it was lacking a lot of features I
> needed (Windows support, overwrite-parameter, overriding behavior through
> subclassing).
>
> - The `Boltons library collection <https://github.com/mahmoud/boltons>`_
> features a class for atomic file writes, which seems to have a very similar
> ``overwrite`` parameter. It is lacking Windows support though.
>
> License
> =======
>
> Licensed under the MIT, see ``LICENSE``.
diff '--color=auto' -r atomicwrites-1.4.1/README.rst atomicwrites-homeassistant-1.4.1/README.rst
14a15,16
> Fork because the original package is unmaintained.
>
24c26
<
---
>
54c56
< atomic.
---
> atomic.
diff '--color=auto' -r atomicwrites-1.4.1/setup.py atomicwrites-homeassistant-1.4.1/setup.py
17c17
< name='atomicwrites',
---
> name='atomicwrites-homeassistant',
| 00:55:33 |
@hexa:lossy.network | * Only in atomicwrites-1.4.1: atomicwrites.egg-info
Only in atomicwrites-homeassistant-1.4.1: atomicwrites_homeassistant.egg-info
diff '--color=auto' -r atomicwrites-1.4.1/PKG-INFO atomicwrites-homeassistant-1.4.1/PKG-INFO
1,2c1,2
< Metadata-Version: 1.2
< Name: atomicwrites
---
> Metadata-Version: 2.1
> Name: atomicwrites-homeassistant
9,136d8
< Description: ===================
< python-atomicwrites
< ===================
<
< .. image:: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites.svg?branch=master
< :target: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites
< .. image:: https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/vadc4le3c27to59x/branch/master?svg=true
< :target: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/untitaker/python-atomicwrites/branch/master
< .. image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/python-atomicwrites/badge/?version=latest
< :target: https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/?badge=latest
< :alt: Documentation Status
<
< **Atomic file writes.**
<
< .. code-block:: python
<
< from atomicwrites import atomic_write
<
< with atomic_write('foo.txt', overwrite=True) as f:
< f.write('Hello world.')
< # "foo.txt" doesn't exist yet.
<
< # Now it does.
<
< See `API documentation <https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#api>`_ for more
< low-level interfaces.
<
< Features that distinguish it from other similar libraries (see `Alternatives and Credit`_):
<
< - Race-free assertion that the target file doesn't yet exist. This can be
< controlled with the ``overwrite`` parameter.
<
< - Windows support, although not well-tested. The MSDN resources are not very
< explicit about which operations are atomic. I'm basing my assumptions off `a
< comment
< <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsdesktop/en-US/449bb49d-8acc-48dc-a46f-0760ceddbfc3/movefileexmovefilereplaceexisting-ntfs-same-volume-atomic?forum=windowssdk#a239bc26-eaf0-4920-9f21-440bd2be9cc8>`_
< by `Doug Cook
< <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/doug%20e.%20cook>`_, who appears
< to be a Microsoft employee:
<
< Question: Is MoveFileEx atomic if the existing and new
< files are both on the same drive?
<
< The simple answer is "usually, but in some cases it will silently fall-back
< to a non-atomic method, so don't count on it".
<
< The implementation of MoveFileEx looks something like this: [...]
<
< The problem is if the rename fails, you might end up with a CopyFile, which
< is definitely not atomic.
<
< If you really need atomic-or-nothing, you can try calling
< NtSetInformationFile, which is unsupported but is much more likely to be
< atomic.
<
< - Simple high-level API that wraps a very flexible class-based API.
<
< - Consistent error handling across platforms.
<
<
< How it works
< ============
<
< It uses a temporary file in the same directory as the given path. This ensures
< that the temporary file resides on the same filesystem.
<
< The temporary file will then be atomically moved to the target location: On
< POSIX, it will use ``rename`` if files should be overwritten, otherwise a
< combination of ``link`` and ``unlink``. On Windows, it uses MoveFileEx_ through
< stdlib's ``ctypes`` with the appropriate flags.
<
< Note that with ``link`` and ``unlink``, there's a timewindow where the file
< might be available under two entries in the filesystem: The name of the
< temporary file, and the name of the target file.
<
< Also note that the permissions of the target file may change this way. In some
< situations a ``chmod`` can be issued without any concurrency problems, but
< since that is not always the case, this library doesn't do it by itself.
<
< .. _MoveFileEx: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365240%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
<
< fsync
< -----
<
< On POSIX, ``fsync`` is invoked on the temporary file after it is written (to
< flush file content and metadata), and on the parent directory after the file is
< moved (to flush filename).
<
< ``fsync`` does not take care of disks' internal buffers, but there don't seem
< to be any standard POSIX APIs for that. On OS X, ``fcntl`` is used with
< ``F_FULLFSYNC`` instead of ``fsync`` for that reason.
<
< On Windows, `_commit <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17618685.aspx>`_
< is used, but there are no guarantees about disk internal buffers.
<
< Alternatives and Credit
< =======================
<
< Atomicwrites is directly inspired by the following libraries (and shares a
< minimal amount of code):
<
< - The Trac project's `utility functions
< <http://www.edgewall.org/docs/tags-trac-0.11.7/epydoc/trac.util-pysrc.html>`_,
< also used in `Werkzeug <http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/>`_ and
< `mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile
< <https://github.com/mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile>`_. The idea to use
< ``ctypes`` instead of ``PyWin32`` originated there.
<
< - `abarnert/fatomic <https://github.com/abarnert/fatomic>`_. Windows support
< (based on ``PyWin32``) was originally taken from there.
<
< Other alternatives to atomicwrites include:
<
< - `sashka/atomicfile <https://github.com/sashka/atomicfile>`_. Originally I
< considered using that, but at the time it was lacking a lot of features I
< needed (Windows support, overwrite-parameter, overriding behavior through
< subclassing).
<
< - The `Boltons library collection <https://github.com/mahmoud/boltons>`_
< features a class for atomic file writes, which seems to have a very similar
< ``overwrite`` parameter. It is lacking Windows support though.
<
< License
< =======
<
< Licensed under the MIT, see ``LICENSE``.
<
< Platform: UNKNOWN
147a20,149
> License-File: LICENSE
>
> ===================
> python-atomicwrites
> ===================
>
> .. image:: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites.svg?branch=master
> :target: https://travis-ci.com/untitaker/python-atomicwrites
> .. image:: https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/vadc4le3c27to59x/branch/master?svg=true
> :target: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/untitaker/python-atomicwrites/branch/master
> .. image:: https://readthedocs.org/projects/python-atomicwrites/badge/?version=latest
> :target: https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/?badge=latest
> :alt: Documentation Status
>
> **Atomic file writes.**
>
> Fork because the original package is unmaintained.
>
> .. code-block:: python
>
> from atomicwrites import atomic_write
>
> with atomic_write('foo.txt', overwrite=True) as f:
> f.write('Hello world.')
> # "foo.txt" doesn't exist yet.
>
> # Now it does.
>
> See `API documentation <https://python-atomicwrites.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#api>`_ for more
> low-level interfaces.
>
> Features that distinguish it from other similar libraries (see `Alternatives and Credit`_):
>
> - Race-free assertion that the target file doesn't yet exist. This can be
> controlled with the ``overwrite`` parameter.
>
> - Windows support, although not well-tested. The MSDN resources are not very
> explicit about which operations are atomic. I'm basing my assumptions off `a
> comment
> <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsdesktop/en-US/449bb49d-8acc-48dc-a46f-0760ceddbfc3/movefileexmovefilereplaceexisting-ntfs-same-volume-atomic?forum=windowssdk#a239bc26-eaf0-4920-9f21-440bd2be9cc8>`_
> by `Doug Cook
> <https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/doug%20e.%20cook>`_, who appears
> to be a Microsoft employee:
>
> Question: Is MoveFileEx atomic if the existing and new
> files are both on the same drive?
>
> The simple answer is "usually, but in some cases it will silently fall-back
> to a non-atomic method, so don't count on it".
>
> The implementation of MoveFileEx looks something like this: [...]
>
> The problem is if the rename fails, you might end up with a CopyFile, which
> is definitely not atomic.
>
> If you really need atomic-or-nothing, you can try calling
> NtSetInformationFile, which is unsupported but is much more likely to be
> atomic.
>
> - Simple high-level API that wraps a very flexible class-based API.
>
> - Consistent error handling across platforms.
>
>
> How it works
> ============
>
> It uses a temporary file in the same directory as the given path. This ensures
> that the temporary file resides on the same filesystem.
>
> The temporary file will then be atomically moved to the target location: On
> POSIX, it will use ``rename`` if files should be overwritten, otherwise a
> combination of ``link`` and ``unlink``. On Windows, it uses MoveFileEx_ through
> stdlib's ``ctypes`` with the appropriate flags.
>
> Note that with ``link`` and ``unlink``, there's a timewindow where the file
> might be available under two entries in the filesystem: The name of the
> temporary file, and the name of the target file.
>
> Also note that the permissions of the target file may change this way. In some
> situations a ``chmod`` can be issued without any concurrency problems, but
> since that is not always the case, this library doesn't do it by itself.
>
> .. _MoveFileEx: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365240%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>
> fsync
> -----
>
> On POSIX, ``fsync`` is invoked on the temporary file after it is written (to
> flush file content and metadata), and on the parent directory after the file is
> moved (to flush filename).
>
> ``fsync`` does not take care of disks' internal buffers, but there don't seem
> to be any standard POSIX APIs for that. On OS X, ``fcntl`` is used with
> ``F_FULLFSYNC`` instead of ``fsync`` for that reason.
>
> On Windows, `_commit <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17618685.aspx>`_
> is used, but there are no guarantees about disk internal buffers.
>
> Alternatives and Credit
> =======================
>
> Atomicwrites is directly inspired by the following libraries (and shares a
> minimal amount of code):
>
> - The Trac project's `utility functions
> <http://www.edgewall.org/docs/tags-trac-0.11.7/epydoc/trac.util-pysrc.html>`_,
> also used in `Werkzeug <http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/>`_ and
> `mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile
> <https://github.com/mitsuhiko/python-atomicfile>`_. The idea to use
> ``ctypes`` instead of ``PyWin32`` originated there.
>
> - `abarnert/fatomic <https://github.com/abarnert/fatomic>`_. Windows support
> (based on ``PyWin32``) was originally taken from there.
>
> Other alternatives to atomicwrites include:
>
> - `sashka/atomicfile <https://github.com/sashka/atomicfile>`_. Originally I
> considered using that, but at the time it was lacking a lot of features I
> needed (Windows support, overwrite-parameter, overriding behavior through
> subclassing).
>
> - The `Boltons library collection <https://github.com/mahmoud/boltons>`_
> features a class for atomic file writes, which seems to have a very similar
> ``overwrite`` parameter. It is lacking Windows support though.
>
> License
> =======
>
> Licensed under the MIT, see ``LICENSE``.
diff '--color=auto' -r atomicwrites-1.4.1/README.rst atomicwrites-homeassistant-1.4.1/README.rst
14a15,16
> Fork because the original package is unmaintained.
>
24c26
<
---
>
54c56
< atomic.
---
> atomic.
diff '--color=auto' -r atomicwrites-1.4.1/setup.py atomicwrites-homeassistant-1.4.1/setup.py
17c17
< name='atomicwrites',
---
> name='atomicwrites-homeassistant',
| 00:55:38 |
@hexa:lossy.network | same package, different metadata | 00:55:51 |
@hexa:lossy.network | wild | 00:55:51 |
oddlama | I'm also not sure. I think the main issue is that they hardcode the directory to /data in the first place, otherwise we could just skip the bind mount which seems to cause the problems. I've seen the same CHIP:DL: Failed to create temp file /data/chip_factory.ini-gR0axc: Permission denied error on a friends HA instance, but never on mine. The difference being that they use a nixos container and I am running on bare metal. Maybe the added file system namespace interferes with the bind mount in some way. | 12:22:30 |
| @noah_andrews:matrix.org changed their display name from noah_andrews to harperrr. | 23:22:46 |
| 24 Feb 2025 |
| Leon joined the room. | 00:30:38 |
mattleon | I tested this nixpkgs PR on my system, and it appears to fix the permissions issue. Still not sure exactly why it happens for v7 but not prior versions, though. In further testing, it seems like the issue was the matter SDK update, which has this PR: https://github.com/project-chip/connectedhomeip/pull/35428 | 01:33:26 |
| Lyn (they/she) joined the room. | 03:41:48 |
K900 | Are you fucking kidding me | 17:02:43 |