| 12 Dec 2024 |
 @qbit:tapenet.org | anyone see anything similar? | 14:40:46 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | changing the address to 127.0.0.1 doesn't resolve it | 14:41:04 |
| @qbit:tapenet.org | on unstable | 14:44:01 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | Skallwar: the simple truth is that we can only autoload custom lovelace modules when lovelace is in yaml mode, but even when it is not we still install the modules, but you need to load them manually | 14:52:11 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | 
Download image.png | 14:52:34 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | click the pen top right, from the burger menu choose manage resources | 14:53:12 |
 Skallwar | I borked my ssh connection to my home lab... I will look at that later. Thanks for your input ! | 15:15:07 |
 dotlambda | What do we do about https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/364068 ? | 15:16:52 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I agree that it is a hack | 15:17:36 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | substract 899 from your rebuild count and you're golden | 15:17:43 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | that'll throw us back years in terms of maintainability | 15:18:04 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | rebuild count and nixpkgs-review look at the same list | 15:18:36 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | so we can't have one without the other | 15:18:40 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | and folding all tests back in will make the core package much more annoying again | 15:19:23 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | not recursing into the attrset also means we don't get hydra results anymore | 15:19:46 |
| dotlambda | We could add a top-level attr tests that is recursed into but subtracted from the rebuild count | 15:20:16 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | to be fair, they are rebuilds, and unpacking the home-assistant source 900 times has a certain cost to it | 15:20:56 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | and creating a precedent for top-level attributes that are free is probably not smart | 15:21:39 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
to be fair, they are rebuilds, and unpacking the home-assistant source 900 times has a certain cost to it I don't think many people mind the cost the builds incur on Hydra. | 15:22:26 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
and creating a precedent for top-level attributes that are free is probably not smart Wdym? | 15:22:34 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | emacs people are also saying their package set rebuilds are essentially free 😄 | 15:24:48 |
| dotlambda | One alternative to having a top-level attribute at all would be adding the respective component tests to all reverse dependencies' passthru.tests | 15:29:34 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | yeah, I thought about that as well, but it generally fluctuates too much | 15:30:18 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | they're swapping out dependencies for the same component every other release and we fail to clean up unused deps already | 15:30:59 |
| dotlambda | We'd have write a script that keeps the passthru.tests up to date | 15:31:27 |
| dotlambda | * We'd have to write a script that keeps the
passthru.tests up to date | 15:31:51 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | sorry for being the naysayer in this conversation fwiw 😄 | 15:31:55 |
| dotlambda | * We'd have to write a script that keeps the `passthru.tests` up to date | 15:32:14 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | there is two things to loose:
a) hydra for bisects
b) nixpkgs-review for dependency bumps | 15:33:19 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I'd much rather loose a) than b) | 15:33:49 |
