!QhvgabMQzwEQeWehhZ:lossy.network

NixOS Home Automation

512 Members
Declarative Home Automation and other Sidequests | https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/Home_Assistant136 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Jun 2021
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
There are email addresses in maintainer-list.nix, for instance
My reasoning was more like: He couldn't possibly have followed the discussion in our Matrix rooms, so I can't really blame him. But you're right, we should tell him.
00:59:12
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)Ah yes, as opposed to me, who religiously checks Matrix :p00:59:42
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)But I get your point00:59:45
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda* My reasoning was more like: He couldn't possibly have followed the discussion in our Matrix rooms, so I can't really blame them. But you're right, we should tell them.00:59:58
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
Ah yes, as opposed to me, who religiously checks Matrix :p
We agreed that a coordinated answer would be better upon frenck's first comments.
01:00:36
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)This is a... sensitive topic... so I should have checked here first01:00:37
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
We agreed that a coordinated answer would be better upon frenck's first comments.
Yeah, that basically fell apart when people continued replying anyway
01:01:04
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)and took the discussion to the HA forums, etc.01:01:20
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
Yeah, that basically fell apart when people continued replying anyway
Sadly, and you would hope that lessons were learned.
01:01:29
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
This is a... sensitive topic... so I should have checked here first
I'm not saying I find his requests just as deplorable as you, but it just shines a very bad light on us as a project if we don't speak with one voice.
01:02:33
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda* I'm not saying I don't find his requests just as deplorable as you, but it just shines a very bad light on us as a project if we don't speak with one voice.01:02:54
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)I added "[This is all my personal opinion and not the position of "The NixOS Project" or anything like that]", and I'll leave it at that01:06:34
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)Anyway, I don't mean to be grumpy but you could definitely have been less antagonistic when pinging me; it tends to put people on the defensive a bit01:11:53
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)(I appreciate that you were just trying to be helpful though)01:13:53
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkquestion is, since we kinda agree to disagree at this point, ignore every one of his requests?01:27:41
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkor reevaluate our position every time he adds one of these01:28:13
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network * or reevaluate our position every time he adds one of these comments01:28:16
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)maybe just say "we get it please stop commenting, we understand your position" but in more polite terms :p01:30:39
@kity:kity.wtfashkitten (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️this is disappointing, i thought he had come around and was cooperating01:30:46
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkOr at least relenting01:47:46
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkI've just browsed archlinuxes packaging of home-assistant02:37:11
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkwe are doing mighty fine.02:37:18
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old) hexa: how about not reviewing this type of prs in nixpkgs itself. 05:10:44
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)It only harms both communities and drain energy having to deal with that.05:11:35
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng LiI still don't get why he commented in the first place - Didn't he come around less than a week ago? Or has he forgotten already?05:23:29
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng LiI mean, even if he wasn't actually sincere and is still being passive aggressive, he should still have *acknowledged* our previous exchange in some way05:36:57
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
I've just browsed archlinuxes packaging of home-assistant
Theirs can use pip.
08:06:08
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network dotlambda: their packaging is outdated https://archlinux.org/packages/community/any/home-assistant/ 09:47:36
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkhttps://bugs.archlinux.org/task/67961?project=5&string=home-assistant09:48:07
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networki does not seem to find/install dependencies on first start?09:48:14

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6