| 13 Jun 2021 |
 dotlambda | In reply to @zhaofeng:zhaofeng.li
It's truly unfathomable that he would act this way, but it's even worse now with the founder taking a stance. I might have to rewrite my integration for my portable AC for OpenHAB... Where did Paulus take a stance? | 13:49:24 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | in the forum post by Mic92 | 13:49:48 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | though I wouldn't say they took a stance wrt non-foss bindings in hass | 13:50:14 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
Probably even part of Nabu Casa, not sure His GitHub profile lists him as a member. | 13:51:03 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | yep | 13:51:45 |
| dotlambda | While browsing the forum I came across https://community.home-assistant.io/t/block-nabucasa/315377/3. HA has become a 100% commercial product. | 13:53:09 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | yep, don't use default_config | 13:54:05 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | though I respect that they want to invest more time in home-assistant, because it actually is a good thing compared to all the cloud crap out there | 13:54:33 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
yep, don't use default_config That might be a good thing to add to our documentation. | 13:55:11 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | yeah, I think our documentation is lacking quite a bit | 13:55:58 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
in the forum post by Mic92 Do you have a link? | 13:56:39 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | https://nixos.wiki/wiki/Home-assistant | 13:58:18 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | yup, just the wiki | 13:58:28 |
| dotlambda | Paulus made a comment in our wiki? | 13:59:46 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | oh, sorry | 14:00:41 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | https://community.home-assistant.io/u/mic92/activity/topics | 14:02:51 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | they deleted it | 14:02:57 |
 Mic92 (Old) | Unlisted | 14:03:23 |
| dotlambda | Mic92: | 14:03:46 |
| dotlambda | * Mic92: Can you send a screenshot? | 14:03:54 |
| Mic92 (Old) | dotlambda: https://community.home-assistant.io/t/consider-to-avoid-adding-library-dependencies-from-frenck/315185/4 | 14:05:58 |
| dotlambda | Thanks! | 14:06:08 |
| Mic92 (Old) | Whos is Paulus? | 14:06:46 |
| Mic92 (Old) | * Who is Paulus? | 14:06:54 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | balloob | 14:07:31 |
| dotlambda | I read the forum post and I must say I agree that lukegb (he/him) 's locking of the PR seems premature.
But I also agree that "he asked nicely" is not really true cause FOSS discussions are technical and he denied to go that route.
Maybe we should still make it even more obvious that issues should be reported to us if in doubt, by saying so in the wiki and the module options' descriptions. Then we should let upstream know we did so. | 14:23:59 |
| Mic92 (Old) | I agree with that. | 14:30:55 |
 lukegb (he/him) | In reply to @robert:funklause.de
I read the forum post and I must say I agree that lukegb (he/him) 's locking of the PR seems premature.
But I also agree that "he asked nicely" is not really true cause FOSS discussions are technical and he denied to go that route.
Maybe we should still make it even more obvious that issues should be reported to us if in doubt, by saying so in the wiki and the module options' descriptions. Then we should let upstream know we did so. The discussion had gone on for 10 comments or so, and it was clear it wasn't going to make progress. Also he decided to start spam-opening issues *shrug* | 15:39:19 |
| lukegb (he/him) | It's difficult to have a conversation with someone who doesn't engage and just copies and pastes the same message over and over again | 15:39:45 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
The discussion had gone on for 10 comments or so, and it was clear it wasn't going to make progress. Also he decided to start spam-opening issues *shrug* Talking about the issues: Why don't we close all but one? | 15:43:13 |
