!QhvgabMQzwEQeWehhZ:lossy.network

NixOS Home Automation

508 Members
Declarative Home Automation and other Sidequests | https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/Home_Assistant132 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
12 Jun 2021
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkOur packaging is good enough to make most things work reasonabl y well19:16:32
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkWhy else would we bother running that huge humber of tests19:17:03
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkAnd our hardening is just awesome if I might say so19:17:45
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)hexa: maybe just add a disclosure in home-assistant that users first should issues on our site before bringing them upstream.19:22:25
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkWhere though?19:23:35
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)In the exception handler of home-assistant :)19:24:24
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)ok, and we should also just all press the block button here https://github.com/frenck to not have waste our time in future.19:40:30
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)Than he cannot comment on our PRs.19:40:50
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkI would want to say let's not do that just yet, but I think the damage is done20:11:41
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkTIL: https://github.com/onkelbeh/HomeAssistantRepository20:54:25
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkalso opinionated through USE flags20:54:52
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network
There are several methods of installing Home Assistant, and really, there is no “best” way. Whatever somebody tells you, it is a personal choice.
21:46:46
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkhttps://frenck.dev/my-home-assistant/21:46:56
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkthat is cute 21:46:58
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network
I run Home Assistant, which powers my home, on a custom build computer running Proxmox. In Proxmox, I have created a virtual machine running Linux (Debian Buster) for Home Assistant. I’ve used the Supervised Installer to install Home Assistant Supervised. Yes, I run a Supervised system.
21:47:07
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng Li joined the room.22:32:59
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng LiRegarding the regrettable drama, has he filed a report to Fedora yet? I'm interested to see their reaction.23:04:23
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng LiIt's truly unfathomable that he would act this way, but it's even worse now with the founder taking a stance. I might have to rewrite my integration for my portable AC for OpenHAB...23:06:43
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkI have looked and not found anything yet23:11:07
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkyeah, would be a shame to have to leave home-assistant behind23:11:29
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng LiAnother project that has publicly stated their dislike of distribution packages that I know of is xpra, but from my limited interaction with its maintainer they seem to be nice: https://www.xpra.org/trac/wiki/Packaging/DistributionPackages23:14:19
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkIf only our packaging was bad23:23:30
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)The Xpra one is interesting because they're like: Arch is great! They don't really patch things and they're up to date23:33:18
@fabaff:matrix.orgFabian Affolter
In reply to @zhaofeng:zhaofeng.li
Regarding the regrettable drama, has he filed a report to Fedora yet? I'm interested to see their reaction.
Will be interesting as I'm the maintainer for at least one of the packages in question for the Fedora Package Collection as well
23:50:50
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng LiI'm also surprised they seemingly did not realize that you are a major contributor to Home Assistant as well.23:53:29
13 Jun 2021
@fabaff:matrix.orgFabian AffolterLet's say "I was". It changed over time as I'm not so much interested in "easy installation and setup for everybody" but in the possibility to run an installation for years07:36:08
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)
In reply to @fabaff:matrix.org
Let's say "I was". It changed over time as I'm not so much interested in "easy installation and setup for everybody" but in the possibility to run an installation for years
Do you still maintain the fedora part?
08:05:29
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92 (Old)
In reply to @fabaff:matrix.org
Let's say "I was". It changed over time as I'm not so much interested in "easy installation and setup for everybody" but in the possibility to run an installation for years
* Do you still maintain the fedora part actively?
08:05:59
@fabaff:matrix.orgFabian Affolter I do as time permits. Fedora IoT is an official edition and when you are talking about IoT then you have to have bindings
Using pip on an immutable OS...let's leave that alone for now 😋
08:33:13
@fabaff:matrix.orgFabian AffolterInitially my target was CentOS for the IoT stuff because of the long support. To get there the packages have to go through Fedora08:37:14

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6