| 12 Jun 2021 |
 lukegb (he/him) | I think just politely declining is probably a good start | 15:01:21 |
 Mic92 (Old) | Right | 15:01:29 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | We should | 15:02:33 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Our way of using Home-Assistant might not be his way | 15:03:01 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Doesn't have to be 🤷♂️ | 15:05:07 |
| Mic92 (Old) | hexa: i will merge this | 15:07:58 |
| Mic92 (Old) | I will report this to home-assistant itself. | 15:15:27 |
| Mic92 (Old) | This guy is a ticking timebomb. home-assistant should not consider there code: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126326 | 15:15:51 |
| Mic92 (Old) | Is he a core contributor of home-assistant | 15:17:15 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Wow. | 15:17:19 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Yes | 15:17:22 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Probably even part of Nabu Casa, not sure | 15:17:48 |
| Mic92 (Old) | https://community.home-assistant.io/t/consider-to-avoid-adding-library-dependencies-from-frenck/315185 | 15:27:04 |
| Mic92 (Old) | hexa: please merge ;) https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126678 | 15:32:46 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I'm on the phone in the pool right now | 15:34:17 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I'll take a look in a bit | 15:34:22 |
| Mic92 (Old) | lukegb (he/him): or Fabian Affolter could probably also merge. | 15:34:44 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | lukegb (he/him): thanks, I think this was a good decision | 16:24:47 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | https://github.com/home-assistant/core/pull/51779 | 16:39:38 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | such a platinum integration | 16:39:43 |
| Mic92 (Old) | The best of the best of the best sir. | 16:40:28 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Best guess is: This is about potential influx of support cases | 16:41:25 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Worst guess is: This is about monetization, no sponsorship button when installing via nixpkgs | 16:41:43 |
| lukegb (he/him) | The fun part is, even if he changes the license to exclude us from redistributing it, we're still allowed to if he uploads it to PyPi | 16:42:10 |
| Mic92 (Old) | I think it is the latter one, otherwise he would have been more upfront. | 16:42:23 |
| lukegb (he/him) | because the PyPi ToS explicit grant the PSF and all users of the website rights to distribute | 16:42:33 |
| Mic92 (Old) | I think also pypi does not allow you to depublish stuff easily | 16:42:47 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Worst case then would be not submitting tests to PyPi | 16:42:48 |
| lukegb (he/him) | Right. | 16:42:53 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | which is a setuptools kind of thing to do | 16:43:26 |
