| 12 Jun 2021 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | and I'm using wled | 13:54:06 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | so I'm moderately pissed | 13:54:10 |
| @hexa:lossy.network |
- adguardhome
- toonapi
- wled
- twentemilieu
| 13:56:20 |
| @hexa:lossy.network |
- 12: "adguard" = ps: with ps; [ adguardhome ];
- 868: "toon" = ps: with ps; [ aiohttp-cors hass-nabucasa toonapi ];
- 953: "wled" = ps: with ps; [ wled ];
886: "twentemilieu" = ps: with ps; [ twentemilieu ];
| 13:57:13 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | *
- 12: "adguard" = ps: with ps; [ adguardhome ];
- 868: "toon" = ps: with ps; [ aiohttp-cors hass-nabucasa toonapi ];
- 953: "wled" = ps: with ps; [ wled ];
- 886: "twentemilieu" = ps: with ps; [ twentemilieu ];
| 13:57:19 |
 lukegb (he/him) | We were having a bit of a discussion in #dev:nixos.org | 13:57:25 |
| lukegb (he/him) | I think... there's precedent for ignoring upstream's wishes to not package software in e.g. Debian | 13:57:38 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | awesome | 13:57:59 |
| lukegb (he/him) | if it was a leaf package or of relatively little importance I'd be inclined to agree | 13:58:03 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | let's add a note to these packages though, not to bother upstream at all | 13:58:11 |
| lukegb (he/him) | but it might be good to include something in the nixpkgs manual regarding our policy for this | 13:58:16 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | if we decide to go that route | 13:58:27 |
| lukegb (he/him) | (when I say "upstream's wishes" I don't mean this upstream, I mean upstreams in general) | 13:58:38 |
 Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
indeed Just ignore him. | 14:52:31 |
| Mic92 (Old) | He cannot really tell us what to do. | 14:52:44 |
 Fabian Affolter | Not the fist time that the person in question is acting that way. | 14:53:54 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @fabaff:matrix.org
Not the fist time that the person in question is acting that way. ok. if we starts attacking people on a personal level, we can block him. | 14:54:27 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @fabaff:matrix.org
Not the fist time that the person in question is acting that way. * ok. if he starts attacking people on a personal level, we can block him. | 14:54:49 |
| Fabian Affolter | I try to go the "Fedora-way" and keep an open relation to upstream. Upstream and downstream project can benefit from each other | 14:55:28 |
| Mic92 (Old) | Sure but here it seems like there is no point and zero interest | 14:56:29 |
| Fabian Affolter |
"I don't like it" is not really a reason and asking politely doesn't make the request more legit | 14:59:16 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @fabaff:matrix.org
"I don't like it" is not really a reason and asking politely doesn't make the request more legit We can also just fork-mirror the repo and make ourself the new upstream... :) | 15:00:31 |
| Mic92 (Old) | The license allows that | 15:00:39 |
| lukegb (he/him) | I think just politely declining is probably a good start | 15:01:21 |
| Mic92 (Old) | Right | 15:01:29 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | We should | 15:02:33 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Our way of using Home-Assistant might not be his way | 15:03:01 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Doesn't have to be 🤷♂️ | 15:05:07 |
| Mic92 (Old) | hexa: i will merge this | 15:07:58 |
| Mic92 (Old) | I will report this to home-assistant itself. | 15:15:27 |
