12 Jun 2021 |
Mic92 (Old) | This guy is a ticking timebomb. home-assistant should not consider there code: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126326 | 15:15:51 |
Mic92 (Old) | Is he a core contributor of home-assistant | 15:17:15 |
@hexa:lossy.network | Wow. | 15:17:19 |
@hexa:lossy.network | Yes | 15:17:22 |
@hexa:lossy.network | Probably even part of Nabu Casa, not sure | 15:17:48 |
Mic92 (Old) | https://community.home-assistant.io/t/consider-to-avoid-adding-library-dependencies-from-frenck/315185 | 15:27:04 |
Mic92 (Old) | hexa: please merge ;) https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126678 | 15:32:46 |
@hexa:lossy.network | I'm on the phone in the pool right now | 15:34:17 |
@hexa:lossy.network | I'll take a look in a bit | 15:34:22 |
Mic92 (Old) | lukegb (he/him): or Fabian Affolter could probably also merge. | 15:34:44 |
@hexa:lossy.network | lukegb (he/him): thanks, I think this was a good decision | 16:24:47 |
@hexa:lossy.network | https://github.com/home-assistant/core/pull/51779 | 16:39:38 |
@hexa:lossy.network | such a platinum integration | 16:39:43 |
Mic92 (Old) | The best of the best of the best sir. | 16:40:28 |
@hexa:lossy.network | Best guess is: This is about potential influx of support cases | 16:41:25 |
@hexa:lossy.network | Worst guess is: This is about monetization, no sponsorship button when installing via nixpkgs | 16:41:43 |
lukegb (he/him) | The fun part is, even if he changes the license to exclude us from redistributing it, we're still allowed to if he uploads it to PyPi | 16:42:10 |
Mic92 (Old) | I think it is the latter one, otherwise he would have been more upfront. | 16:42:23 |
lukegb (he/him) | because the PyPi ToS explicit grant the PSF and all users of the website rights to distribute | 16:42:33 |
Mic92 (Old) | I think also pypi does not allow you to depublish stuff easily | 16:42:47 |
@hexa:lossy.network | Worst case then would be not submitting tests to PyPi | 16:42:48 |
lukegb (he/him) | Right. | 16:42:53 |
@hexa:lossy.network | which is a setuptools kind of thing to do | 16:43:26 |
@hexa:lossy.network | I don't think pyproject projects usually do that | 16:43:34 |
@hexa:lossy.network | and yet, there are no tests on PyPi | 16:43:50 |
@hexa:lossy.network | https://github.com/frenck/python-ambee/blob/main/pyproject.toml#L23-L25 | 16:44:10 |
@hexa:lossy.network | I'm disappointed that he considers our home-assistant to be "broken" | 16:44:37 |
@andi:kack.it | What is the stance of the other home assistant people towards what supported systems are? Them running their own distribution is nice but I always feared it will at some point be the only supported way of running it. | 18:33:36 |
Fabian Affolter | There has to be made a distinction between the Home Assistant Community and Nabucasa. NC would prefer if there is only HassOS. The target audience for HassOS are home users and home users are likely to pay for the cloud integration. | 18:58:06 |
Fabian Affolter | The community is running Home Assistant wherever they can (NAS, Kubernetes, venv , all kind of operating systems and hardware platforms). Those users often don't want an additional Raspi running and are capable to have remote access in a secure way | 19:00:10 |