!QhvgabMQzwEQeWehhZ:lossy.network

NixOS Home Automation

521 Members
Declarative Home Automation and other Sidequests | https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/Home_Assistant137 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
17 Jun 2021
@balsoft:balsoft.rubalsoftOk, I guess, let's just wait22:44:06
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda* Since he doesn't, he's not interested in hearing our positive stories either.22:38:09
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda* Since he doesn't, he's not interested in hearing our positive stories either. (referring to my comment above)22:38:29
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkbalsoft: home-assistant has close to 1000 components, imagine the python dependency tree, it's a moving target23:00:56
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaHow do we want to handle disabled components as in https://github.com/home-assistant/core/commit/de74028958d3fbf01119fe1259596c60206cdbce?23:28:23
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkunpin dependencies and go23:30:23
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkthe thing has tests23:30:41
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkthe pinned deps are cerifi, requests and urllib323:30:59
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkI don't expect much breakage23:31:04
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaThe component tests don't work though, I'll post the output in a second23:32:43
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdahttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126047#issuecomment-863629291 :(23:46:18
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkah meh23:47:25
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
The component tests don't work though, I'll post the output in a second
It's just ImportError: cannot import name 'EEBrightBoxException' from 'eebrightbox' because HA needs an older version than the most recent one.
23:49:57
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkeither stop caring or add an override to home-assistant23:51:38
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkI wish fetchFromGitHub was overridable23:52:51
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkwould making them alot more compact23:53:13
18 Jun 2021
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda lukegb (he/him): It would be nice if you coordinated with others before replying to frenck's comments. We agreed not to react in this room. (referring to https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/126047#issuecomment-863647123) 00:50:54
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him) dotlambda: eh, this was an attempt at a "dear other random committer please go away" 00:52:37
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaDoesn't matter what your intention was. You should have asked here first.00:53:25
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)I didn't realise I needed your permission00:55:50
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)My mistake :)00:55:59
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)I assume you've also gone to yell at jagajaga as well00:56:31
@robert:funklause.dedotlambdaI'm not talking about my permission and you know that.00:56:39
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
I assume you've also gone to yell at jagajaga as well
No, I couldn't find him on Matrix.
00:56:49
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)There are email addresses in maintainer-list.nix, for instance00:57:47
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
There are email addresses in maintainer-list.nix, for instance
My reasoning was more like: He couldn't possibly have followed the discussion in our Matrix rooms, so I can't really blame him. But you're right, we should tell him.
00:59:12
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)Ah yes, as opposed to me, who religiously checks Matrix :p00:59:42
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)But I get your point00:59:45
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda* My reasoning was more like: He couldn't possibly have followed the discussion in our Matrix rooms, so I can't really blame them. But you're right, we should tell them.00:59:58
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
Ah yes, as opposed to me, who religiously checks Matrix :p
We agreed that a coordinated answer would be better upon frenck's first comments.
01:00:36

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6