| 18 Jun 2021 |
 lukegb (he/him) | This is a... sensitive topic... so I should have checked here first | 01:00:37 |
| lukegb (he/him) | In reply to @robert:funklause.de
We agreed that a coordinated answer would be better upon frenck's first comments. Yeah, that basically fell apart when people continued replying anyway | 01:01:04 |
| lukegb (he/him) | and took the discussion to the HA forums, etc. | 01:01:20 |
 dotlambda | In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
Yeah, that basically fell apart when people continued replying anyway Sadly, and you would hope that lessons were learned. | 01:01:29 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninja
This is a... sensitive topic... so I should have checked here first I'm not saying I find his requests just as deplorable as you, but it just shines a very bad light on us as a project if we don't speak with one voice. | 01:02:33 |
| dotlambda | * I'm not saying I don't find his requests just as deplorable as you, but it just shines a very bad light on us as a project if we don't speak with one voice. | 01:02:54 |
| lukegb (he/him) | I added "[This is all my personal opinion and not the position of "The NixOS Project" or anything like that]", and I'll leave it at that | 01:06:34 |
| lukegb (he/him) | Anyway, I don't mean to be grumpy but you could definitely have been less antagonistic when pinging me; it tends to put people on the defensive a bit | 01:11:53 |
| lukegb (he/him) | (I appreciate that you were just trying to be helpful though) | 01:13:53 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | question is, since we kinda agree to disagree at this point, ignore every one of his requests? | 01:27:41 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | or reevaluate our position every time he adds one of these | 01:28:13 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | * or reevaluate our position every time he adds one of these comments | 01:28:16 |
| lukegb (he/him) | maybe just say "we get it please stop commenting, we understand your position" but in more polite terms :p | 01:30:39 |
 ashkitten (it/its) 🏳️⚧️ | this is disappointing, i thought he had come around and was cooperating | 01:30:46 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Or at least relenting | 01:47:46 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I've just browsed archlinuxes packaging of home-assistant | 02:37:11 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | we are doing mighty fine. | 02:37:18 |
 Mic92 (Old) | hexa: how about not reviewing this type of prs in nixpkgs itself. | 05:10:44 |
| Mic92 (Old) | It only harms both communities and drain energy having to deal with that. | 05:11:35 |
 Zhaofeng Li | I still don't get why he commented in the first place - Didn't he come around less than a week ago? Or has he forgotten already? | 05:23:29 |
| Zhaofeng Li | I mean, even if he wasn't actually sincere and is still being passive aggressive, he should still have *acknowledged* our previous exchange in some way | 05:36:57 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
I've just browsed archlinuxes packaging of home-assistant Theirs can use pip. | 08:06:08 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | dotlambda: their packaging is outdated https://archlinux.org/packages/community/any/home-assistant/ | 09:47:36 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/67961?project=5&string=home-assistant | 09:48:07 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | i does not seem to find/install dependencies on first start? | 09:48:14 |
| dotlambda | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
i does not seem to find/install dependencies on first start? I doubt it. I would rather want to see the missing part of the logs. Why would you use `joirnalctl -f` for that? 🙈 | 10:20:16 |
| dotlambda | * I doubt it. I would rather want to see the missing part of the logs. Why would you use `journalctl -f` for that? 🙈 | 10:20:52 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | log starts with
Sep 21 22:24:54 testing systemd[1]: Started Home assistant.
| 10:21:03 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | so yeah, maybe something is amis | 10:21:09 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/70615?project=5&string=home-assistant | 10:21:23 |
