| 12 Jun 2021 |
 Fabian Affolter | Nowadays, there are three supported installation methods$ | 19:00:38 |
| Fabian Affolter | * Nowadays, there are three supported installation methods | 19:00:49 |
| Fabian Affolter | Sorry, four methods https://github.com/home-assistant/architecture/tree/master/adr | 19:02:22 |
 Mic92 (Old) | They got to be careful so not to mess with there contributors too much. | 19:02:35 |
| Mic92 (Old) | I don't think the average hassos user will improve integrations. | 19:03:00 |
| Fabian Affolter | Indeed | 19:03:51 |
| Fabian Affolter | The regular HassOS user is just a consumer and happy if the lights can be controlled ;-) | 19:04:52 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | The only nixos related contact I had was with the issue tracker, when tests were failing. Mostly racy ones. The message I got was that if it doesn't fail for them they don't want to invest the time to fix it. | 19:05:05 |
| Fabian Affolter | The Home Assistant eco-system has become a bubble. | 19:06:06 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | And since we use highly parallel xdist, while they run their CI on Github Actions, we are going to trigger some weird things | 19:06:16 |
| Fabian Affolter | ...and the GitHub Actions changes in one way or another...schupps, there are the same issues | 19:09:52 |
| Mic92 (Old) | We just need to wait until hass gets more cores :) | 19:09:56 |
| Mic92 (Old) | s/hass/github actions/ | 19:10:04 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | And ultimately no NixOS should think they can get support for home-assistant anywhere besides the NixOS community | 19:12:26 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | unless they disguise themselves properly | 19:12:37 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
And ultimately no NixOS should think they can get support for home-assistant anywhere besides the NixOS community Time for a new github identity? | 19:14:35 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I don't think one would have to go that far. | 19:15:02 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Just doing ones due diligence that the issue is not NixOS' fault would be good enough | 19:15:36 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Our packaging is good enough to make most things work reasonabl y well | 19:16:32 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Why else would we bother running that huge humber of tests | 19:17:03 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | And our hardening is just awesome if I might say so | 19:17:45 |
| Mic92 (Old) | hexa: maybe just add a disclosure in home-assistant that users first should issues on our site before bringing them upstream. | 19:22:25 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Where though? | 19:23:35 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In the exception handler of home-assistant :) | 19:24:24 |
| Mic92 (Old) | ok, and we should also just all press the block button here https://github.com/frenck to not have waste our time in future. | 19:40:30 |
| Mic92 (Old) | Than he cannot comment on our PRs. | 19:40:50 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I would want to say let's not do that just yet, but I think the damage is done | 20:11:41 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | TIL: https://github.com/onkelbeh/HomeAssistantRepository | 20:54:25 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | also opinionated through USE flags | 20:54:52 |
| @hexa:lossy.network |
There are several methods of installing Home Assistant, and really, there is no “best” way. Whatever somebody tells you, it is a personal choice.
| 21:46:46 |
