| 12 Jun 2021 |
 lukegb (he/him) | if it was a leaf package or of relatively little importance I'd be inclined to agree | 13:58:03 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | let's add a note to these packages though, not to bother upstream at all | 13:58:11 |
| lukegb (he/him) | but it might be good to include something in the nixpkgs manual regarding our policy for this | 13:58:16 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | if we decide to go that route | 13:58:27 |
| lukegb (he/him) | (when I say "upstream's wishes" I don't mean this upstream, I mean upstreams in general) | 13:58:38 |
 Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
indeed Just ignore him. | 14:52:31 |
| Mic92 (Old) | He cannot really tell us what to do. | 14:52:44 |
 Fabian Affolter | Not the fist time that the person in question is acting that way. | 14:53:54 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @fabaff:matrix.org
Not the fist time that the person in question is acting that way. ok. if we starts attacking people on a personal level, we can block him. | 14:54:27 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @fabaff:matrix.org
Not the fist time that the person in question is acting that way. * ok. if he starts attacking people on a personal level, we can block him. | 14:54:49 |
| Fabian Affolter | I try to go the "Fedora-way" and keep an open relation to upstream. Upstream and downstream project can benefit from each other | 14:55:28 |
