| 12 Jun 2021 |
 Mic92 (Old) | We just need to wait until hass gets more cores :) | 19:09:56 |
| Mic92 (Old) | s/hass/github actions/ | 19:10:04 |
 @hexa:lossy.network | And ultimately no NixOS should think they can get support for home-assistant anywhere besides the NixOS community | 19:12:26 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | unless they disguise themselves properly | 19:12:37 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
And ultimately no NixOS should think they can get support for home-assistant anywhere besides the NixOS community Time for a new github identity? | 19:14:35 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I don't think one would have to go that far. | 19:15:02 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Just doing ones due diligence that the issue is not NixOS' fault would be good enough | 19:15:36 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Our packaging is good enough to make most things work reasonabl y well | 19:16:32 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Why else would we bother running that huge humber of tests | 19:17:03 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | And our hardening is just awesome if I might say so | 19:17:45 |
| Mic92 (Old) | hexa: maybe just add a disclosure in home-assistant that users first should issues on our site before bringing them upstream. | 19:22:25 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | Where though? | 19:23:35 |
| Mic92 (Old) | In the exception handler of home-assistant :) | 19:24:24 |
| Mic92 (Old) | ok, and we should also just all press the block button here https://github.com/frenck to not have waste our time in future. | 19:40:30 |
| Mic92 (Old) | Than he cannot comment on our PRs. | 19:40:50 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I would want to say let's not do that just yet, but I think the damage is done | 20:11:41 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | TIL: https://github.com/onkelbeh/HomeAssistantRepository | 20:54:25 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | also opinionated through USE flags | 20:54:52 |
| @hexa:lossy.network |
There are several methods of installing Home Assistant, and really, there is no “best” way. Whatever somebody tells you, it is a personal choice.
| 21:46:46 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | https://frenck.dev/my-home-assistant/ | 21:46:56 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | that is cute | 21:46:58 |
| @hexa:lossy.network |
I run Home Assistant, which powers my home, on a custom build computer running Proxmox. In Proxmox, I have created a virtual machine running Linux (Debian Buster) for Home Assistant. I’ve used the Supervised Installer to install Home Assistant Supervised. Yes, I run a Supervised system.
| 21:47:07 |
|  Zhaofeng Li joined the room. | 22:32:59 |
| Zhaofeng Li | Regarding the regrettable drama, has he filed a report to Fedora yet? I'm interested to see their reaction. | 23:04:23 |
| Zhaofeng Li | It's truly unfathomable that he would act this way, but it's even worse now with the founder taking a stance. I might have to rewrite my integration for my portable AC for OpenHAB... | 23:06:43 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | I have looked and not found anything yet | 23:11:07 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | yeah, would be a shame to have to leave home-assistant behind | 23:11:29 |
| Zhaofeng Li | Another project that has publicly stated their dislike of distribution packages that I know of is xpra, but from my limited interaction with its maintainer they seem to be nice: https://www.xpra.org/trac/wiki/Packaging/DistributionPackages | 23:14:19 |
| @hexa:lossy.network | If only our packaging was bad | 23:23:30 |
 lukegb (he/him) | The Xpra one is interesting because they're like: Arch is great! They don't really patch things and they're up to date | 23:33:18 |
