| 19 Nov 2025 |
 Vladimír Čunát | I also thought, but it was easy to try when we lack ideas. | 18:24:45 |
 ghpzin | If anubis update is suspected, there was a mention about blocking "Docker / OCI registry clients" by default accidentally in 1.23.0+
https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis/pull/1253
(there is a way to opt-in fix it in 1.23.1) | 18:45:52 |
| ghpzin | * If anubis update is suspected, there was a mention about blocking "Docker / OCI registry clients" by default accidentally in 1.23.0+
https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis/pull/1253
https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis/releases/tag/v1.23.1
(there is a way to opt-in fix it in 1.23.1) | 18:47:54 |
 adamcstephens | That seems an unlikely issue as this isn't a docker/oci client | 19:07:45 |
 teutat3s | Maybe related, we noticed more breakage than just docker / OCI clients with the update from anubis 1.22 to 1.23, specifically codeberg pages (pages-server) was no longer able to reach our forgejo. I don't have a specific commit to point the finger at, but my impression is that anubis 1.23 somehow applies stricter rules. | 19:17:27 |
| teutat3s | * Maybe related, we noticed more breakage than just docker / OCI clients with the update from anubis 1.22 to 1.23, specifically codeberg pages (pages-server) was no longer able to reach our forgejo. I don't have a specific commit to point the finger at, but my impression is that anubis 1.23 somehow applies stricter rules.
EDIT: Downgrading to anubis 1.22 fixed our specific issue. | 19:18:55 |
| 20 Nov 2025 |
|  John joined the room. | 05:31:05 |
| 21 Nov 2025 |
|  isabel changed their profile picture. | 18:14:28 |
| 23 Nov 2025 |
 leona | hi, could someone create the 25.11 hydra jobsets within the next day? We plan to do branchoff tomorrow or Tuesday evening (CET). ref: https://nixos.github.io/release-wiki/Branch-Off.html#jobset-creation | 15:50:45 |
 hexa | leona: all set up | 16:31:38 |
| hexa | jobsets that were missing: nixos/staging-next-25.11-small, nixpkgs/staging-25.11 | 16:36:11 |
| hexa | * jobsets that are missing: in the release wiki nixos/staging-next-25.11-small, nixpkgs/staging-25.11 | 16:36:24 |
| hexa | * jobsets that are missing: in the release wiki
- nixos/staging-next-25.11-small,
- nixpkgs/staging-25.11
| 16:36:32 |
| leona | will add them, thank you | 16:41:35 |
| hexa | also, there is stableRelease and officialRelease | 16:42:13 |
| hexa | * also, there is stableRelease and officialRelease | 16:42:21 |
| hexa | I wonder if there is any good documentation on those flags | 16:43:19 |
| hexa | there is no mention of stableRelease anywhere in nixpkgs | 16:43:41 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Shouldn't that be stableBranch? | 16:45:10 |
| hexa | welp, yeah | 16:45:23 |
| hexa | so stableBranch on nixos jobsets and officialRelease on the nixpkgs jobsets? | 16:46:04 |
| leona | stableBranch influences the versionSuffix | 16:46:40 |
| leona | (and therefore also rebuilds a lot of tests 🫠) | 16:47:00 |
| Vladimír Čunát | It looks that way. | 16:46:56 |
| leona | officialRelease apparently does the same, byt for the tarball :D | 16:48:12 |
| leona | * officialRelease apparently does the same, but for the tarball :D | 16:48:18 |
| hexa | great, would you mind writing that down? 😄 | 16:48:47 |
| hexa | I set all of them to false now fwiw | 16:49:10 |
| leona | I don't really know what the best place would be for that? | 16:49:14 |
| hexa | I think this is between release team and infra team | 16:49:31 |
