!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

395 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.120 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
28 Sep 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand recursing into pkgsRocm was a non-starter17:14:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexabut importing it into the existing jobset is absolutely fine with me17:15:21
@lt1379:matrix.orgLunIs there a point in still having a separate release-rocm.nix then? I could put the generated list of different-for-rocm packages somewhere in rocm-modules and have release.nix's pull those in under packageJobs without needing a new top level release- file18:00:15
@lt1379:matrix.orgLun* Is there a point in still having a separate release-rocm.nix then? I could put the generated list of different-for-rocm packages somewhere in rocm-modules and have release.nix pull those in under packageJobs without needing a new top level release- file18:00:49
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátWhatever the way, I assume that we want to filter the jobs for x86_64-linux only, so the approach should support that somehow. (Because other platforms are rarely combined with HW where rocm makes sense?)18:17:27
@k900:0upti.meK900 Technically you can have an AMD GPU in an ARM server 18:20:53

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6