!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

372 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.114 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
21 Oct 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)no mention of "opavote" (case insensitive) in the postfix log of the last 14 days21:46:17
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)that would be from oct 7th 21:46:31
@7c6f434c:nitro.chat@7c6f434c:nitro.chatThanks! No clue what bounce they are complaining about then, but oh well.21:47:00
@lt1379:matrix.orgLunCould it be related to https://github.com/NixOS/infra/issues/873 if that'21:54:09
@lt1379:matrix.orgLun* Could it be related to https://github.com/NixOS/infra/issues/873 if that's impacting MX lookups?21:54:16
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)no, that issue was only affecting ALIAS records for resolvers that were directed to the milano pop of Gandi23:02:38
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)and we only had alias records on the apex, since we can't have CNAMEs there23:02:59
22 Oct 2025
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatMX is on the apex, but ALIAS is only about address records, so I don't think MX queries were affected.05:19:50
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatMan, Gandi support is being really unhelpful about the ALIAS issue.05:29:29
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI heard Gandi has gone downhill the past years...14:21:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)it has15:47:38
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)their motto for a long time was "No bullshit"15:48:01
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)dnscontrol maps an alias to a cname on a non apex name15:52:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)sigh15:52:42
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)I'm going to sacrifice nix.dev ig15:52:50
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly) Have we considered moving websites to be under www.<whatever>? 17:15:32
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)something for marketing to decide17:17:40
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)this breaks all kinds of search engine entries17:17:48
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)aiui17:17:54
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)but right now they're investigating alternatives to netlify where we can just point to ip addresses17:18:15
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatIt does? I'd assume that you still keep the non-www variant as a slow-ish http redirect.17:19:15
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)yeah, but the url changes, you get duplicated content in the cache17:19:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)vague memories here17:19:42
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatYes, you want the URL to change.17:19:56
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat(and avoid using the non-www variant)17:20:10
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)yes, but with the understanding what that means for our web presence17:20:18
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat* (and avoid using the non-www variant in links, etc.)17:20:21
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)which is not infra's job17:20:22
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)feel free to suggest that to marketing though17:20:55
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatIs there a problem with the current setup, though?17:23:33

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6