NixOS Infrastructure - Public Room Timeline

	NixOS Infrastructure	388 Members
	Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) \| Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 \| See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.	120 Servers

Load older messages

Sender	Message	Time
5 May 2025
uep	i got a few random 500's earlier today, looked like db timeouts	09:36:19
uep	wasn't too surprised	09:36:47
K900	My favorite part is when the insert deadlocks and gets killed	09:37:24
K900	And you know what happens next	09:37:31
K900	If you guessed "tough luck run the entire eval all over again", you're correct	09:37:46
Vladimír Čunát	And that doesn't happen immediately but at the next scheduled timer (or if someone does it manually).	09:43:26
	@federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their display name from This legally distinct plastic brick is licensed under the terms of the he/him or they/them pronouns, at your choice to This LEGO© Worm™ is licensed under the terms of the he/him or they/them pronouns, at your choice.	20:48:05
6 May 2025
	@federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their display name from This LEGO© Worm™ is licensed under the terms of the he/him or they/them pronouns, at your choice to This LEGO® Worm™ is licensed under the terms of the he/him or they/them pronouns, at your choice.	09:12:16
edef	Redacted or Malformed Event	19:34:33
edef	https://search.nixos.org/packages?channel=unstable&from=0&size=50&sort=relevance&type=packages&query=kdeconnect	19:34:34
edef	… i guess we can't post screenshots anymore	19:35:05
edef	Problem with the value at json.hits.hits[0]['_source']: { "type": "package", "package_attr_name": "emacsPackages.kdeconnect", "package_attr_set": "emacsPackages", "package_pname": "emacs-kdeconnect", "package_pversion": "20231029.2250", "package_platforms": [ "javascript-ghcjs", "riscv64-netbsd", "rx-none", "x86_64-solaris", "i686-none", "armv7l-netbsd", "i686-cygwin", "x86_64-cygwin", "armv5tel-linux", "x86_64-linux", "aarch64-none", "mips-none", "riscv32-linux", "mips64-none", "m68k-none", "vc4-none", "powerpc-none", "m68k-netbsd", "x86_64-redox", "powerpcle-none", "aarch64-linux", "m68k-linux", "mips-linux", "arm-none", "i686-windows", "armv7a-linux", "msp430-none", "mmix-mmixware", "microblazeel-linux", "s390-linux", "x86_64-freebsd", "wasm64-wasi", "aarch64-genode", "i686-linux", "x86_64-genode", "x86_64-darwin", "x86_64-windows", "aarch64-windows", "armv6l-none", "i686-openbsd", "armv6l-netbsd", "powerpc64-linux", "loongarch64-linux", "or1k-none", "wasm32-wasi", "riscv32-none", "aarch64-freebsd", "armv6l-linux", "microblaze-linux", "x86_64-netbsd", "aarch64_be-none", "riscv64-none", "i686-freebsd", "riscv64-linux", "i686-genode", "riscv32-netbsd", "armv7l-linux", "armv7a-netbsd", "s390x-linux", "microblazeel-none", "s390-none", "mips64-linux", "aarch64-netbsd", "mipsel-netbsd", "avr-none", "powerpc-netbsd", "x86_64-openbsd", "x86_64-none", "microblaze-none", "powerpc64le-linux", "s390x-none", "mips64el-linux", "mipsel-linux", "i686-netbsd", "aarch64-darwin" ], "package_outputs": [ "out" ], "package_default_output": "out", "package_programs": [], "package_license": [], "package_license_set": [], "package_maintainers": [], "package_maintainers_set": [], "package_description": null, "package_longDescription": null, "package_hydra": null, "package_system": "x86_64-linux", "package_homepage": [ "https://github.com/carldotac/kdeconnect.el" ], "package_position": "pkgs/applications/editors/emacs/elisp-packages/libgenerated.nix:139" } Expecting an OBJECT with a field named `package_teams`	19:35:13
hexa	not unless moderation lifts the policy	19:35:15
ghpzin (moved to @ghpzin:envs.net)	https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-search/issues/925	19:35:22
hexa	raboof made some changes recently	19:35:36
edef	cool, i guess this is a dup	19:35:46
Tristan Ross	It's resolved now	21:04:10
7 May 2025
Winter	if i have a patch that i suspect will cause lots of potential turmoil, but do want to incrementally fix it to the point where that’s not the case, would it be possible to get a h.n.o jobset for the branch?	08:07:31
Vladimír Čunát	In principle we do that, though the timing... it might be difficult now-ish due to things happening around 25.05 release, but I suspect that we'll get periods of waiting for -darwin builds and -linux being relatively free in several days.	08:20:10
K900	After release IMO	08:20:19
Vladimír Čunát	* In principle we do that, though the timing... it might be difficult now-ish due to things happening around 25.05 release, but I suspect that we'll get periods of waiting for -darwin builds and -linux being relatively free (e.g. in several days it might happen).	08:20:38
Winter	yep, i was gonna bring that up — happy to wait till after release	08:31:26
	tnias joined the room.	11:29:14
8 May 2025
	isabel changed their profile picture.	08:58:10
9 May 2025
Winter	have we frequently been cancelling darwin evals recently-ish? see https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/trunk/diffoscope.aarch64-darwin -- a bunch of builds from this year were cancelled or time out (presumably due to load, the fact that they're timing out during tests means nothing because the tests take like a few seconds on my system)	05:16:00
Winter	* have we frequently been cancelling darwin evals recently-ish? see https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/trunk/diffoscope.aarch64-darwin -- a bunch of builds from this year were cancelled or timed out (presumably due to load, the fact that they're timing out during tests means nothing because the tests take like a few seconds on my system)	05:16:14
Vladimír Čunát	They	05:49:50
Vladimír Čunát	* They're timeouts, almost always (click them to see).	05:50:07
Vladimír Čunát	The only thing that gets commonly cancelled are non-current builds, I believe (i.e. if some later build in the jobset already exists).	05:51:30
Vladimír Čunát	* The only thing that gets commonly cancelled are non-current builds, I believe (i.e. if some later build of the same job in the jobset already exists).	05:51:46

Show newer messages

Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6