| 30 Mar 2025 |
 Vladimír Čunát | * The file that we have there seems... more complicated that leaving it as a plain (old) zone file. Though I expect dnscontrol is (also) meant for more complex cases. | 17:51:19 |
 hexa | and how do we sync that plain zone file to netlify? 🤔 | 17:51:37 |
| hexa | and how we validate it in CI? | 17:51:44 |
| hexa | rndc check-zone? 😄 | 17:51:53 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Sure, I didn't mean to imply I know about some better toolchain. | 17:52:16 |
| hexa | also I think the spf/dmarc builders are nice syntactic sugar | 17:52:18 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Sure, I didn't mean to imply I know about some better toolchain. I don't do this kind of thing. | 17:52:23 |
| hexa | and funtion(arg, arg ,arg), is imo better than arg\s+arg\s+arg\s+ | 17:52:48 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I think this stuff often depends on whether you have a good linter. | 17:53:12 |
| hexa | I wish you would've held as strong opinions about the terraform provider 😛 | 17:53:47 |
| Vladimír Čunát | (I'm sorry... let me not digress anymore.) | 17:54:03 |
| hexa | (don't worry, no offense or anything taken, it's a fun discourse) | 17:54:21 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Sure, I meant it more like... it didn't seem too helpful in this particular channel. | 17:56:19 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Sure, I meant it more like... it didn't seem too helpful in this particular channel to continue. | 17:56:25 |
| hexa | I think the check/preview/apply workflow makes dnscontrol (any possibly also octodns) interesting solutions in this space | 17:58:20 |
| hexa | * I think the check/preview/apply workflow makes dnscontrol (and possibly also octodns) interesting solutions in this space | 17:58:32 |
 Jeremy Fleischman (jfly) | to pile on the tangent: i'm part of an org that's vaguely considering octodns. any thoughts on it vs dnscontrol? | 17:59:05 |
| hexa | I didn't choose it because it was a modular Python thing 😄 | 17:59:29 |
| hexa | also I ran various places with dnscontrol already and have made good experiences | 17:59:54 |
| Jeremy Fleischman (jfly) | hahaha, home assistant is enough modular Python for you? | 18:00:30 |
| Jeremy Fleischman (jfly) | (enough modular python for a lifetime) | 18:00:57 |
| hexa | that response was fully expected, I just didn't know who would make it 😉 | 18:01:21 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Maybe home assistant is a major reason why avoiding modular pythons things? | 18:05:46 |
| hexa | its not so much about any python thing in particular, but about modular CLI tools, like ansible for example | 18:06:57 |
| hexa | they tell you to pip install ansible, but that is just the library, which pulls in ansible-core | 18:07:52 |
| hexa | but when you do nix-shell -p python3.pkgs.ansible there would be no ansible executable in your path | 18:08:26 |
| hexa | or composability with pylsp modules https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/229337 | 18:08:52 |
| hexa | with home-assistant the module takes good care about the composition aspect | 18:09:04 |
| 1 Apr 2025 |
|  Sandro changed their display name from Sandro 🐧 to Sandro 🐧 [c3d2]. | 13:56:09 |
| Sandro changed their display name from Sandro 🐧 [c3d2] to "Sandro [c3d2]". | 13:56:53 |
