!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

382 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.117 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
30 Mar 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaimage.png
Download image.png
17:45:13
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterah, my bad17:45:17
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinteri thought you meant storage for some reason17:45:22
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterwonder what happens when you hit the 100gb limit17:45:31
@hexa:lossy.networkhexagreat question 😄 17:45:40
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhosting the ISOs on Netlify 😆17:45:42
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterthose are in S3 i think?17:45:52
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanah, they're on releases.nixos.org (s3 fronted by fastly)17:45:59
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinteryeah17:46:05
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátSpecifying DNS records in javascript? 😱 Maybe I'm biased, though.17:48:18
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI do consider dnscontrol more a DSL than actual Javascript, but yes, it gets evaluated by a Javascript engine17:49:13
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyyou can do that with Pulumi too :P17:49:15
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThe file that we have there seems... more complicated that leaving it as a plain (old) zone file. Though I expect they're meant for more complex cases.17:51:03
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* The file that we have there seems... more complicated that leaving it as a plain (old) zone file. Though I expect dnscontrol is (also) meant for more complex cases.17:51:19
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand how do we sync that plain zone file to netlify? 🤔17:51:37
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand how we validate it in CI?17:51:44
@hexa:lossy.networkhexarndc check-zone? 😄 17:51:53
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátSure, I didn't mean to imply I know about some better toolchain.17:52:16
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaalso I think the spf/dmarc builders are nice syntactic sugar17:52:18
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* Sure, I didn't mean to imply I know about some better toolchain. I don't do this kind of thing.17:52:23
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa and funtion(arg, arg ,arg), is imo better than arg\s+arg\s+arg\s+ 17:52:48
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI think this stuff often depends on whether you have a good linter.17:53:12
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI wish you would've held as strong opinions about the terraform provider 😛 17:53:47
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(I'm sorry... let me not digress anymore.)17:54:03
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa(don't worry, no offense or anything taken, it's a fun discourse)17:54:21
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátSure, I meant it more like... it didn't seem too helpful in this particular channel.17:56:19
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* Sure, I meant it more like... it didn't seem too helpful in this particular channel to continue.17:56:25
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI think the check/preview/apply workflow makes dnscontrol (any possibly also octodns) interesting solutions in this space17:58:20
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* I think the check/preview/apply workflow makes dnscontrol (and possibly also octodns) interesting solutions in this space17:58:32
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly)to pile on the tangent: i'm part of an org that's vaguely considering octodns. any thoughts on it vs dnscontrol?17:59:05

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6