| 24 Mar 2025 |
 hexa | but apparently https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/367695 has not landed yet | 14:54:24 |
| hexa | * but apparently https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/367695 has not landed so far | 14:54:33 |
 Vladimír Čunát | That would be ~1 TB / month just from staging* rebuilds for this. | 14:59:17 |
 emily | right. I commented as much on the RFC. (from the RFC diff after the conversation earlier it seems like your earlier comment was misinterpreted as "the current normal cache growth rate is 2 TB/month compared to this being 700 GB one time"?) | 15:00:13 |
| emily | (rather than "this would add 2 TB/month rather than 700 GB one time, because of rebuilds") | 15:00:31 |
| emily | at least, the RFC claims that the current growth rate is 2 TB/month so we shouldn't worry about a one-time increase, but neither of those seems accurate | 15:00:51 |
 ElvishJerricco | So how much of a problem is this? Can we absorb a 15-30% hit to cache size growth? Or does that make the RFC a non-starter from an infra perspective? | 15:08:38 |
| emily | the infra team isn't the one paying the bills | 15:09:03 |
 toonn | Wasn't the sponsorship extension based on a commitment to reduce the size of the cache? | 15:14:08 |
| emily | that's my understanding, which I also mentioned in https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/185#issuecomment-2748339200 | 15:14:33 |
| emily | I just mean that's more Foundation than it is infra team, AFAIU | 15:15:05 |
| emily | they're the ones responsible for the bill ultimately | 15:15:17 |
| ElvishJerricco | Redacted or Malformed Event | 15:23:22 |
| ElvishJerricco | wrong room :P | 15:23:32 |
 raitobezarius | yes, there was even deduplication proposals using CAStore in the past | 15:28:44 |
|  sinan changed their display name from sinan (we're so back) to sinan. | 16:00:09 |
| sinan changed their profile picture. | 16:00:11 |
 K900 | Kicked unstable-small to pick up the kernel bumps | 16:03:25 |
| hexa | updated the two oakhost macs to 15.3.2 | 18:28:55 |
| 25 Mar 2025 |
| hexa | updating the remaining macs | 00:19:41 |
| hexa | ok, all done | 00:38:54 |
| K900 | Can someone take a look at what happened to channel-scripts? | 07:12:58 |
| K900 | update-nixos-unstable-small.service doesn't seem to be triggering at all | 07:13:10 |
| K900 | 
Download {894248C5-0566-4A0E-BD57-805DE6447608}.png | 07:13:35 |
| K900 | OK what | 07:13:37 |
| Vladimír Čunát |
Mar 25 07:10:25 pluto update-nixos-unstable-small-start[2382223]: channel would go back in time from https://releases.nixos.org/nixos/unstable-small/nixos-25.05beta773513.621f88662af5 to nixos-25.05pre773850.126db443ed3f, >
| 07:14:29 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Could that be some side effect of this revert?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/392904 | 07:15:37 |
| K900 | Yes | 07:16:39 |
| K900 | I think you need to force it now | 07:16:50 |
| K900 | Try running it with FORCE=1 | 07:17:16 |
