| 2 Mar 2025 |
 adamcstephens | Should we revert for now to give time for further investigation? | 21:37:06 |
| adamcstephens | This is failing lix tests, or it's failing when run on a lix host? | 21:39:24 |
 hexa | reproduced this on the aarch64-linux community builder, which runs nix 2.25.2 with use-cgroup | 21:43:19 |
| hexa | that's what I used to bisect fwiw | 21:43:25 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
This is failing lix tests, or it's failing when run on a lix host? two different problems | 21:44:23 |
| raitobezarius | what is relevant to lix is only the failed proper cleanup when timing out | 21:44:37 |
| adamcstephens | thanks for clarifying. | 21:45:03 |
 Arian | Wasn't cgroup in nix also kinda screwed? | 21:46:33 |
| Arian | * Wasn't cgroups in nix also kinda screwed? | 21:46:46 |
| Arian | Even with the recent changes the hierarchy is funky | 21:46:55 |
| adamcstephens | i'll open a PR to revert. were you reproducing on nixos.tests.systemd-boot.extraEntries.aarch64-linux ? | 21:48:43 |
| hexa | Yes | 21:48:57 |
| adamcstephens | thanks | 21:49:05 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
Wasn't cgroups in nix also kinda screwed? this is possible but I'm not a CppNix developer so I have no idea | 21:49:07 |
| hexa | Can also disable cgroup usage | 21:49:21 |
| raitobezarius | I recommend to disable it on Lix builders, this doesn't serve any real purpose, Lix 2.93.0 will always create a new cgroup hierarchy even if it cannot be managed as well as desired | 21:49:49 |
| raitobezarius | Later on, once we can cleanup some architectural issues, we will enable proper control over the hierarchy for build farms | 21:50:03 |
| adamcstephens | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/386486 | 21:51:36 |
| hexa | I'm disabling cgroups instead | 22:05:01 |
| adamcstephens | i'll set to draft for now then | 22:05:37 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
i'll set to draft for now then why disabling cgroups would fix that? | 22:51:14 |
| raitobezarius | this doesn't strike me having any relation with cgroups whatsover | 22:51:22 |
| raitobezarius | or hexa (signing key rotation when) did the build succeded without cgroups??? | 22:51:38 |
| hexa | I have no builder w/o cgroups handy | 22:54:34 |
| adamcstephens | I wondered the same thing, but I don't have all the context so figured there was something I'd missed. You're still a maintainer on this package, so feel free to approve ;) | 23:05:51 |
| hexa | yeah ok, still stuck | 23:07:37 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
I wondered the same thing, but I don't have all the context so figured there was something I'd missed. You're still a maintainer on this package, so feel free to approve ;) I don't do nixpkgs out of business hours | 23:08:29 |
| raitobezarius | * I don't do nixpkgs (maintenance work) out of business hours | 23:08:45 |
| raitobezarius | But this is a trivial revert so there's no need to wait on my approval neither IMHO | 23:09:23 |
| adamcstephens | merged the revert | 23:17:58 |
