!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

382 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.117 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
2 Mar 2025
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariussecond is that booting on AA64 ceased to work on that OVMF21:29:42
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusone guess would be that openssl is desync21:30:24
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthat OVMF upgraded to OpenSSL 3.421:30:34
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusbut now someone would need to git bisect over AA64 the boot failure21:30:55
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariushonestly if mbedTLS is now available on public EDK2, people should move to it21:31:29
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthe other weird change is all the confidential computing stuff21:31:50
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensI upgraded to openssl during the bump since upstream had done so as mentioned in the release notes, both to 3.421:36:47
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensShould we revert for now to give time for further investigation?21:37:06
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensThis is failing lix tests, or it's failing when run on a lix host?21:39:24
@hexa:lossy.networkhexareproduced this on the aarch64-linux community builder, which runs nix 2.25.2 with use-cgroup21:43:19
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathat's what I used to bisect fwiw21:43:25
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
This is failing lix tests, or it's failing when run on a lix host?
two different problems
21:44:23
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswhat is relevant to lix is only the failed proper cleanup when timing out21:44:37
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensthanks for clarifying.21:45:03
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianWasn't cgroup in nix also kinda screwed? 21:46:33
@arianvp:matrix.orgArian* Wasn't cgroups in nix also kinda screwed? 21:46:46
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianEven with the recent changes the hierarchy is funky 21:46:55
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephens i'll open a PR to revert. were you reproducing on nixos.tests.systemd-boot.extraEntries.aarch64-linux ? 21:48:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaYes21:48:57
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensthanks21:49:05
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
Wasn't cgroups in nix also kinda screwed?
this is possible but I'm not a CppNix developer so I have no idea
21:49:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaCan also disable cgroup usage21:49:21
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI recommend to disable it on Lix builders, this doesn't serve any real purpose, Lix 2.93.0 will always create a new cgroup hierarchy even if it cannot be managed as well as desired21:49:49
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusLater on, once we can cleanup some architectural issues, we will enable proper control over the hierarchy for build farms21:50:03
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephenshttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/38648621:51:36
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI'm disabling cgroups instead22:05:01
@adam:robins.wtfadamcstephensi'll set to draft for now then22:05:37
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @adam:robins.wtf
i'll set to draft for now then
why disabling cgroups would fix that?
22:51:14
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthis doesn't strike me having any relation with cgroups whatsover22:51:22
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius or hexa (signing key rotation when) did the build succeded without cgroups??? 22:51:38

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6