!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

384 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.118 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
23 Feb 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900And see how many people get hit16:20:25
@k900:0upti.meK900And if it's not many, we can yeet it faster16:20:33
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI can imagine the downside being, someone who knows how to use Plasma 5 but not 6 and has an existing config they want to apply might struggle to use the ISO? but that feels like a stretch especially when we'll expect them to learn how to use 6 by 25.1116:20:36
@k900:0upti.meK900It's not that different anyway16:20:48
@k900:0upti.meK900Unless you have a giga riced Plasma 5 config I guess16:20:54
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily"the convenient install options are all for the version we intend to support" seems like the right nudge16:20:56
@k900:0upti.meK900But if you have a riced Plasma 5 config you probably know Plasma 6 exists16:21:02
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátNote: I believe that we do not offer the ISO on any official place anymore, e.g. https://channels.nixos.org/nixos-unstable/latest-nixos-plasma5-x86_64-linux.iso.sha25616:21:32
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * Note: I think that we do not offer the ISO on any official place anymore, e.g. https://channels.nixos.org/nixos-unstable/latest-nixos-plasma5-x86_64-linux.iso.sha256 16:21:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Yeah, I removed it from channel-scripts a while ago16:21:50
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátSo you'd have to... click on the Hydra job?16:22:19
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyyeah I was confused since the site doesn't offer it anyway16:22:43
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI don't think an upgrade from "dig through Hydra" to "offered in the default installer" is a good idea16:23:03
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily ElvishJerricco: btw, you'll want to send a PR for https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage to land with 25.05's release 16:23:26
@k900:0upti.meK900 It's always offered in the installer 16:24:35
@k900:0upti.meK900As in, it's offered in all the installers16:24:48
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyah, I see16:24:43
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(can you tell I don't use the graphical installer?)16:24:51
@k900:0upti.meK900The installer is the exact same on all ISOs16:25:01
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI think if we are putting warnings on everything we should not offer it as part of our new-user-friendly installer thing.16:25:17
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI can't think of any circumstances in which someone installing a 25.05 Plasma 5 machine without an existing config would be a great idea we'd want to recommend.16:25:31
@k900:0upti.meK900True16:25:47
@k900:0upti.meK900https://github.com/NixOS/calamares-nixos-extensions/pull/5216:29:42
@k900:0upti.meK900Yeet proposed16:29:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily lgtm. I think ElvishJerricco can merge 16:31:24
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI'm shocked my "put GNOME and Plasma on the same ISO" idea worked so well16:31:43
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythere's definitely some stuff we can trim to make the size growth over the previous GNOME ISO not as bad, but I really thought we'd be in for a ~doubling16:32:01
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI think we're going to be the only distro offering that :)16:32:14
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerriccoI will take a look at the context of this conversation in a little bit. But yea the PR seems good to merge for obvious reasons16:44:53
@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgElvishJerricco (This is rather admitting; changes we want to make to the graphical installer have to go through an entire release; really wish it were in-tree) 16:48:54

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6