| 12 Feb 2025 |
hexa | likely after 2 hours of silence | 00:18:29 |
hexa | raitobezarius: the question was: why do some few have corefiles, but most do not, when we're all running them in cgroups | 00:19:13 |
hexa | * raitobezarius: the question was: why do some few have corefiles, but most do not, when we're all running them in the build sandbox | 00:19:23 |
raitobezarius | corefiles are pruned | 00:19:28 |
hexa | yes, but even new crashes have none 😄 | 00:19:39 |
Arian | Systemd deletes them after a while | 00:19:41 |
raitobezarius | maybe the vacuum algorithm is weird | 00:19:53 |
raitobezarius | also corefiles cannot always be obtained | 00:20:08 |
raitobezarius | some crashes simply does not come with corefiles | 00:20:12 |
hexa | yeah, I kinda expected it to be a sandboxing limitation that we get none | 00:20:30 |
raitobezarius | https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/core.5.html | 00:20:30 |
hexa | would also be ridiculuous to store that many 😄 | 00:20:41 |
Arian | PID namespace should isolate coredumps yeh | 00:21:15 |
Arian | @raitobezarius:matrix.org: it's just a tmpfiles rule iirc. | 00:22:06 |
Arian | Anyhow I guess core dumps in the build sandbox are less interesting. We're interested in coredumps of nix-daemon. Still weird they show up in the journal though | 00:23:07 |
| erin "nepeat" computer breaker joined the room. | 01:47:51 |
| arcayr joined the room. | 02:51:50 |
John Ericson | hexa (signing key rotation when): so I can easily just make hydra ignore lines that don't parse as JSON, but I am less sure whether that is good or just treating symptons | 03:00:42 |
John Ericson | the underlying error message about x86_64-darwin no in suported features also looked sketchy | 03:00:59 |
hexa | I just posted that to show where it previously left off | 03:01:44 |
hexa | Ideally we could see that nix-eval-jobs sent broken JSON and send that upstream | 03:02:14 |
hexa | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network I just posted that to show where it previously left off That is to say I am not sure how related it is | 03:02:54 |
John Ericson | OK | 03:03:36 |
John Ericson | I will not read too much into that error message then :) | 03:03:45 |
hexa | In reply to @Ericson2314:matrix.org the underlying error message about x86_64-darwin no in suported features also looked sketchy Maybe I misunderstood where you saw that | 03:04:01 |
John Ericson | https://github.com/NixOS/hydra/issues/1437 | 03:04:34 |
John Ericson | oh unsupported system, not supported features | 03:04:40 |
hexa | error: Unsupported system: aarch64-darwin | 03:04:43 |
John Ericson | yeah | 03:07:07 |
John Ericson | is that an expected eval failure? | 03:07:22 |