!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

390 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.120 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Feb 2025
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátFor both platforms? Anyway, it's already building all packages now.12:48:01
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* For both platforms? Anyway, it's already building all x86_64-linux packages now.12:48:20
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27nope, x86_64-linux only. But I'm fine with going for that onlny at first.12:53:26
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter changed their profile picture.23:30:14
6 Feb 2025
@ss:someonex.netSomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (Gand St. Pieters) to SomeoneSerge (UTC+U[-12,12]).17:47:57
7 Feb 2025
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross I'm looking for where we define the master, nixos-unstable, and nixos-unstable-small merges. I tried looking in GHA and in the infra repo but nothing sticks out. I just need to know how long those get merged into each other for. 03:26:44
@hexa:lossy.networkhexanixos-channel-scripts03:33:05
@hexa:lossy.networkhexamirror-nixos-branch.pl03:33:18
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonhttps://github.com/NixOS/hydra/pull/1421 OK I think this one is ready!16:36:50
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericson switching to nix-eval-jobs 16:36:58
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaexciting16:37:04
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn EricsonI wrote the a final test last night to make sure flake stuff was still working16:37:12
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericson thanks ma27 for 99% of the diff :) 16:37:33
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn EricsonDoes anyone want to give it some final review?16:37:52
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa
$config->{evaluator_max_memory_size} // 4096
16:42:20
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI guess this is not a divison but rather a default value? 🫣16:42:34
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* I guess this is not a kind of divisoin but rather a default value? 🫣16:43:05
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27yes16:43:23
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27

no, actually it's a merge operator

(damn it, just came up with the shitpost after giving the real answer)

16:43:54
@hexa:lossy.networkhexadoes this include the constituents changes we talked about?16:43:56
@emma:rory.gay@emma:rory.gayyeah that syntax gives me "or else" vibes16:44:02
@hexa:lossy.networkhexasorry for asking good questions 😕 16:44:07
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* does this include the constituents changes we talked about? or is that something else?16:44:38
@emma:rory.gay@emma:rory.gaymerging a number into null :)16:44:53
@emma:rory.gay@emma:rory.gayor rather, merging a value into the lack of a value16:45:13
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27
In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
does this include the constituents changes we talked about? or is that something else?
the PR as-is would no longer create constituents, I'm not entirely sure, but I think this might be a problem.
I opened https://github.com/nix-community/nix-eval-jobs/pull/349 for that, though.
16:45:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexauh-oh16:45:52
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27thsi also introduces globbing, I may be able to reserve some time next week to rip that out if you prefer doing this step by step.16:46:01
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaaiui constituents are how we define the tested sets16:46:48
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa cc John Ericson 16:50:23

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6