!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

272 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.86 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
11 Oct 2024
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross
In reply to @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl
Isn't that compression on the builders?
No
05:11:24
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Rosshttps://github.com/NixOS/hydra/issues/55305:11:35
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlMindaviAh, like that05:14:43
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlMindaviOk now it makes sense again :)05:14:55
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI'm fairly certainly that the compression of results on the central machine is what's limiting the throughput almost all the time, as the farm is currently.06:11:34
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyan EPYC with better thermals seems like it'd be a good investment, then?06:12:06
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatWe have some bigger aarch64 in the farm already, so alternatively we could try that "for free".06:13:08
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywouldn't that run into the atomics and platform purity problems wrt the evaluator?06:13:59
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatRight. It might be risky in some ways.06:15:46
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI take it setting up a separate Hydra instance to test it would be onerous – we'd need to just switch over?06:17:32
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI don't see a little down-time as an issue (for hydra.nixos.org)06:20:38
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI more meant it sounds like a pain to revert if it goes wrong06:22:16
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(but maybe it's not)06:22:32
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatNo need to wipe the old machine too soon. And it seems unlikely that we'd want to revert completely.06:23:14
@tomberek:matrix.orgtomberek
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
if the Foundation will pay for a month then it seems worth it to just do it?
Not too hard. We're spending similar amounts on meetups/pizza. Infra team should have a discretionary budget (no?), otherwise throw a submission into this repo similar to this: https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues
06:39:11
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI didn't get the impression that the infra team has a budget at all06:39:33
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythough I don't know how the finances work at all :)06:39:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @vcunat:matrix.org
No need to wipe the old machine too soon. And it seems unlikely that we'd want to revert completely.
I think we should do whatever you think is best for Hydra out of trying an existing AArch64 machine and getting an EPYC to try.
06:40:24

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6