| 14 Feb 2025 |
 Mic92 | @Ericson2314:matrix.org: nix-cmd pkg-config is missing. I have seen this issue before | 01:17:09 |
| Mic92 | It's an issue in the packaging | 01:17:20 |
| Mic92 | Of nix | 01:17:25 |
| Mic92 | https://github.com/nix-community/nix-eval-jobs/actions/runs/13320388649/job/37203792856#step:5:1 | 01:17:42 |
 sterni | hn hno ~600 jobs in queue, maybe time to poke staging-next again? (not sure what's up with those cancellations) | 01:17:52 |
 hexa | #staging:nixos.org should know | 01:22:30 |
| hexa | * #staging:nixos.org should know, I don't | 01:22:36 |
 John Ericson | Mic92: yeah I think it is missing the dev output in the dev shell | 01:22:58 |
| John Ericson | spooky sutff | 01:23:02 |
| Mic92 | @Ericson2314:matrix.org: you are the expert of this part of the code base. I leave this to you ;) | 01:23:56 |
| John Ericson | but this is the evaluator! :) | 01:24:30 |
| John Ericson | ah it failed in CI | 01:25:04 |
| John Ericson | does the testing have to be impure btw? | 01:25:12 |
| John Ericson | I think I asked about this before | 01:25:16 |
| John Ericson | I would certainly be nice to run in a derivation instead! | 01:25:23 |
| Mic92 | @Ericson2314:matrix.org: nix is missing this file. There is also a pkg-config test in the nix repo that I saw failing before | 01:27:49 |
| John Ericson | I built it though! | 01:28:44 |
| John Ericson | if you nix build not nix develop, it will work | 01:28:59 |
| John Ericson | very spooky | 01:29:02 |
| John Ericson | Mic92: pushed a hacky workaround | 02:01:17 |
| John Ericson | very spooky error to repro | 02:01:36 |
| John Ericson | I think this is a Robert Hensing (roberth) one, hehe :) | 02:01:43 |
| John Ericson | https://github.com/nix-community/nix-eval-jobs/pull/352/commits/19da7b7fc2cd4d66e486b9973b4316b633263ece | 02:01:52 |
| John Ericson | CI passed, the workaround for nix-eval-jobs worked! | 02:17:19 |
| Mic92 | Merged | 02:37:06 |
| John Ericson | https://github.com/nix-community/nix-eval-jobs/pull/353 Mic92 if you would be interested in having some sort of nix-next branch like I do for hydra, that would be nice | 03:37:39 |
| John Ericson | nbd if not (and going back and forth between upstream nix and nixpkgs nix is annoying) | 03:37:56 |
| John Ericson | otherwise a nix-next branch in hydra would have to point to a forked repo, which makes for a gross history | 03:38:30 |
| John Ericson | (I like to do things on Hydra and Nix master together, and then merge the branch in Hydra once Nix is released) | 03:38:49 |
|  sinan changed their profile picture. | 12:15:49 |
