!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

374 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.114 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
28 Sep 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)and they only have pkgsRocm and aliases with overrides that enable it14:47:25
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)https://github.com/LunNova/nixpkgs/blob/push-kuknstozqsvo/pkgs/top-level/release-rocm.nix14:48:37
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat Plug in pkgsRocm attribute-subtree? Probably by adding the reference in our pkgs/top-level/release.nix 14:58:22
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat * Plug in this pkgsRocm attribute-subtree? Probably by adding the reference in our pkgs/top-level/release.nix 14:58:29
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat

I mean, if we don't plan to save build resources significantly compared to inclusion, I think it's better to keep the advantages of inclusion:

  • eval and channel sync. (i.e. you'll only need to wait for channels and not also coordinate with an additional jobset)
  • accounting this in rebuild estimates on GitHub PRs
15:03:12
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatAlso visibility in regressions tackled during staging-next.15:03:47

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6