| 26 Jun 2025 |
raitobezarius | https://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2506.1/07850.html | 19:54:24 |
raitobezarius | thankfully I have found another server | 19:54:31 |
raitobezarius | To me, this is not a regression, this was always broken, it just takes a lot of I/O in the VM to materialize the regression | 19:54:50 |
raitobezarius | You can try to revert the "real fix", apply the workaround and verify if this fixes your issues | 19:55:07 |
raitobezarius | If it does, this is the folio management of 9pfs which is still broken atm | 19:55:15 |
Christian Theune | ugh | 19:56:04 |
Christian Theune | so yes | 19:56:07 |
Christian Theune | in your mail, the last point: "massive io in the guest" is what is triggering in our cases, too | 19:56:22 |
Christian Theune | and you mentioning folios makes me weep | 19:56:33 |
Christian Theune | i already had a 3 year journey wrapped up of getting an xfs folio issue fixed last year -_- | 19:56:51 |
raitobezarius | Well, you will be happy to know that the folio code is going to happen even more in more FS subsystems | 19:57:12 |
Alyssa Ross | Didn't we switch to virtio-fs for VM tests? | 19:57:24 |
Christian Theune | linus was not amused when he saw what was going on ... | 19:57:31 |
Christian Theune | Alyssa Ross: 24.11 and 25.05 don't seem to be, might it have been more recent? | 19:58:15 |
Christian Theune | raitobezarius: do you happen to have a patch set for 6.12.34 around that I can try out? | 19:58:51 |
Alyssa Ross | Not more recent than 25.05 | 19:59:13 |
Alyssa Ross | Ah it was buildInLinuxVM, not NixOS tests | 19:59:38 |